A blog about the cool shit we do at Pitzer College.

233 posts.
151 comments.
320 tags.

Uncovered Vault

Creative Commons

Pitzer Uncovered blog by Amy Jasper is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.
Creative Commons License

Mariachi Serenades Senate on Valentine's Day

Exec Board Doesn't Show Up

According to the meeting minutes recorded by Abi Darin '10, all five Executive Board members were absent from last Sunday's Senate meeting. Only Communications Secretary Leah Kahn gave notice that she wouldn't be attending. Abi's minutes [blogger's emphasis supplied]:

Student Senate currently meets at Sunday at 6:30 pm in the Founders room above the d-hall.

Attendance: Garbo, Jerzy, Nick, Rob, Sophy, Sean, Abi, Misa, Julia, Liz, Jaclyn, Marie Claire, Hale, Will, Michael, Mimi, Megan, Alex, Christine, Angie, Liz.

We appoint Rob Ramlow-Sachs as Chair for the evening of February 14, 2010. A day for the lovers. Since Rob is a love symbol (lover of the outdoors) for Pitzer College, he was the obvious choice for a makeshift chair person for the evening.

Motion has been passed to move the budgetary requests to the front of the meeting.
HMC Two300 2010 Party on March 6, 2010. Ask for $300. Approved $300.
Sophy is coming to ask for the third time for monetary aid for the Super Mash Bros/ SAC birthday party for February 27, 2010. Now asking for $1200. Sean makes a new motion that we should change it from $400 to $1200. Will thinks Sophy has suffered enough, and we should approve $1200 today. Approve $1200 for Super Mash Bros/ SAC birthday.

What's happening on your campus this week?
5-C social chair: this coming weekend there is a CMC RAVE (Flauster Damus?)
APC: met at 8am, Sean forgot everything that happened. Director of local global studies position was discussed. Talks of creating an Ad-Hoc.
SAC: says come join us at 9 PM in the G-H.
PAct: Trips Medieval Times and Chinatown for the Chinese new year.
NRS: Meeting every other Tuesday, throwing a staff luncheon for the 10th of March. April 15, 2010 for a NRS prom.
***Brief interruption by the 5-C Mariachi Band. Happy Valentine’s Day everybody. That includes the lovers, the haters, and the fools. Dancing ensues. Senate just got about 100% more entertaining and pleasant. Motion for musical interruptions every week?
Holden Hall Council: meets on Monday at 7pm
Campus life: met on Thursday
FEC: talked about the global local position
Senior Class: meeting on Monday at unidentified time.
Junior Class: meets on Thursday, party on March 26, 2010. From 7-10.
OA: had a lot of applications, several proposed trips, keep proposing. Saturday afternoon is CPR.
Aesthetic committee: new benches will be for announcement painting purposes. (like walker wall)
New Dorms: got approved painting abilities.
Mead hall: is having some attendance issues, COME TO MEAD HALL COUNCIL.

WELCOME NEW SENATORS. Hazing ensues.
Senate Items
Sean motions to create an Ad-Hoc to reach out to the Senators that are not here this week and absent in previous weeks. Question if missing Senators are planning to resign or had alternative reasons for not showing up to Student Senate.
Sean, Nick, Megan, Liz, Charles, Marie Claire, Alex want to be on this proposed ad-hoc.
Megan recommends we reform senate. We talk about this collectively for 7 minutes.
Most people are looking to move forward, perchance by talking to the student body instead of just the senate. Megan recommends a Senate Retreat 4pm Thursday. Marie Claire recommends that we have the retreat next Sunday during senate.
Motion to add this lengthy discussion to the agenda next week. We ayed it.
Motion to only have this discussion at Senate next week. Approved. Abi will send out an e-mail asking students to solicit input on Senate, not on budget requests. This will include requesting agenda items.
Nick brings up the by-laws and the constitution and the ad-hoc to amend these. The biggest issue was with appointments and elections. We decide to not put this on the Agenda for next week.
Sean motions to put Marie Claire and Megan in charge of creating the agenda for next week. Motion passes.
THE END.
Expect an email about senate agenda for next week. Happy Valentine's Day Pitzer College. Stay Classy.

Constitutional Proposal Fails

From Secretary Buddy Bennett:

Dear Students,

While the results of other elections will be forthcoming this week, I am able to report on the status of the constitutional change on the ballot:

The proposed constitution was defeated by a margin of 330 to 148. There were between 510 and 487 votes (depending on how duplicate votes and other abnormalities are counted) in the election, although not all who participated in the election voted on the constitutional change.

Especially as these are unofficial results, I will not hesitate to express a few personal sentiments. Many students at Pitzer expect more from their student government, and came to Pitzer with hopes that have yet to be met. We are by no means back to where we started in the process of attempting to bridge the gap between our expectations and reality. I am truly impressed by the amount of energy and time that students have put into attempting to create this reality; and, I am proud to think that Pitzer is one of the few institutions where students make manifest their commitment to the school by attempting to make it reflect their wants. I hope that the attached essay (Student Essay - The Political History of Pitzer College, 1988) is pleasurable reading for those who have already invested so much in trying to meet expectation with reality.

Happy Travels,

--
Buddy Bennett
Pitzer College c/o 2011
Student Government Secretary

Vote Here

http://www.pitzer.edu/student_life/voting/student_elections.asp

Why Our Current System is Better

The simple fact is this:

Most Pitzer students do not have the desire to get involved in Student Senate. Never have, never will.

We should not be afraid of this.  We should not get mad at them.  They are not bad people.  (I, for one, find many of them likable and fascinating.)

Most Pitzer students (maybe even you, reader!) want to:

make friends and learn cool stuff and go to parties and do community service and study abroad and go to the movies and do an independent study and have lunch for 2 hours and learn a foreign language and join a club or two and get a job.

While a lot of people like to get involved in student organizations, Hall Councils, PACT, and SAC, it is a rare person who wants to get involved in the nitty gritty of college governance.  (If you do want to get involved into Student Senate, email me!  I can help you figure out how to get involved.)

We need a system that accepts this fact and is ready for when that 95% comes calling.

If I have a good idea, I don't want to have to launch a popularity campaign in order corral the votes of 300 people.

I want to be able to present it for 5 minutes to the 45 kids that care most about college policy.

If I have a problem, I don't want to yell it to a "Facilitator" in front of 10 of my friends on the top of a Mound.

I want to be able to go to a website and see the name, picture, and email address of the person who can help me solve it.

Vote NO on the constitutional proposal.

Why the Proposal is Bad

At this Sunday's Senate meeting, Senate Chair Brian Orser opened the discussion on the constitutional proposal that we're all talking about.  I was the only one to raise my hand.

I asked in plain terms:
What are the main objectives of the document?  Who wrote it?
In what specific ways is it superior to the operative Constitution?   What does it try to achieve?
(These were my honest questions.  Every time I have had a conversation about this document, with Senator Buddy Bennett, Senator Liz Lipschultz, with authors Jerzy Kaufman and Jasper Kosokoff, I end up with more questions than I began with.  I have NEVER heard a convincing argument for this constitution that made any sense to me.)
Senator Nick Tagliarino spoke up and "objected" to my questions on the grounds that they had already been answered during the first meeting in which it was proposed, back in November.
Official document author Lianna Schechter '10 said, essentially, that we had already discussed those things.
And with that, discussion ended.

So here we are, on the internet.  Here are my concerns.

Transition

The current Constitution is the result of 16 years of trial, error, and improvement.  It was just approved in April 2009 by a ballot vote of the entire student body.
The new system would require us to start from scratch:  There is no transition plan.  There is no "change.gov".

There has NEVER been public discussion on what would actually happen if this proposal is approved by the student body.

There is no set meeting time for the first meeting.  There are no student leaders to facilitate the first meeting.

If it were approved, there would be a bitter struggle for legitimacy: different groups of students could say "The first meeting will be on Tuesday morning at 10 am at the Grove House!"  "The first meeting will be on the Mounds on Friday afternoon!"

It will require people to create something out of nothingness, and the loudest voices will rule the day.

I think it is entirely possible that if this proposal were to be enacted, a first meeting might never even happen.  The document is just that messy and incomplete.

Governance

The current Constitution is written in good plain English. If the entire Pitzer College student body were abducted by aliens and suffered from mass amnesia, our Student Senate would still survive: the Constitution lays out in simple terms how everything works.  It is a simple and stable framework that specifies where to go, what to do, and how to function, while leaving very broad leeway for what we can actually accomplish.

This proposal is a mess. Its table of contents is fully half the length of the content itself.  It is incredibly difficult to understand, and gives no guidance on how any body will actually function.  It uses language like this:

We are not a collection of atomized individuals.  Rather, we are an ecological student community, exemplifying mutualism, deep inter-relationality, multiplicity and complementarity.  Recognizing this reality, that the development of one of us depends upon the development of all, we find it necessary to construct a space for the collective process of this communal development.

The question is HOW DO WE CONDUCT OURSELVES?  How can I get involved?  Where do I sign up?  Who can I talk to if I want to get something done?  Whose job is it to help me with this issue?  This document completely ignores these central questions.

Exclusion

There is a reality that proponents of the proposal (whoever they may be) are unwilling to face: There are students who can never, will never, and don't want to, come to Student Senate meetings.

This includes student athletes, pre-med students, students with full-time jobs, students taking 5 or 6 classes, New Resource students, off-campus students, Residence Assistants on duty, students with children, whose schedules simply don't allow it.

It may include you, a first-time reader of this blog, who doesn't give a shit about Student Government.  Maybe you never have and you never will, and you're annoyed that this keeps taking up your time and attention.  (It may be hard to believe, but I personally didn't attend a Senate meeting until my second year at Pitzer, and I lived a very full life before I did.)

Under the current system, there are representatives who are accountable to EVERYONE-- who work hard on behalf of the students who aren't there.

Under the new system, the people who show up and shout will get to cast their vote.  For the people who don't, can't, or won't show up, it's like they don't even exist.

Mob Rule

Contrary to its stated objective, this proposal would allow single students to become disproportionately influential.  Students that are very popular, very well-connected, very wealthy, very involved, very opinionated, very outspoken, will effectively rule the Assembly.

Take me, for example.  I'm a senior.  This is my 7th semester living at Pitzer College.  I've introduced speakers for Dining with Democracy in front of audiences of 200 people.  150 people read this blog yesterday.  I have a voice that is FAR louder than the average student.

I am not against this proposal because I'm afraid that my own voice will be drowned out.

I am concerned for the first-year students who will be thrown into a hot mess of a governance system.  I fear for the person who has a good idea but can't articulate it by yelling it out on the spot in front of a 150 people.

But when everybody shouts at once, nobody's voice is heard. And the quiet opinions will be silenced.

The current system of student governance protects minority opinions.  It takes 2/3 of students to end a discussion about something, which protects that one third from being silenced.  Under the new system, 51 people could vote to quiet the voices of 49 students who disagree with them, and win every time.

Vote NO.

What Happened At Senate

200th post, and it's an important one.  Here's the timeline leading up to tonight.

  • 8 months ago, "the Vanguard" was elected to the Executive Board of Student Senate.
  • This Fall, they made 9 secret, illegal appointments to Senate positions.  By "secret" I mean that they were never announced to be senators during a meeting, not ratified via meeting minutes, and they were not listed anywhere public, except perhaps on a Senate attendance sheet.  By "illegal" I mean that the positions are constitutionally required to be filled by election.
  • In September Arthur Levine '13 was persuaded to run for First-year representative in order to vote "yes" on the constitutional proposal.  This election, which was botched and had to be redone, was the only election of the entire 2009-2010 school year.
  • Since the start of the school year, the Executive Board refused to elect senators to fill vacant seats and refused to hold elections for Judicial Council.
  • Since the start of the school year, the Executive Board willfully made a large number of Constitutional violations that would have promoted transparency, accountability, efficiency, environmental responsibility, and student participation.
  • On November 15, 2009, Senator Megan Dooley asked for approval of the creation of an ad hoc that would aim to fix constitutional issues and improve student government.  Chair Brian Orser refused its approval.
  • On November 22, 2009, a proposal was introduced for a new kind of governance system that would significantly decentralize power and create a once-a-month student assembly.  The meeting was well attended and a wide range of opinions on a new system were voiced.
  • For following two weeks, several "town hall meetings" were held under the guise of soliciting student input.  There was very little critical input on the proposal itself, and none of that "input" was ever incorporated into the document itself.
  • On December 2, 2009, Dean of Students Jim Marchant sent an email asking for Student Senate to get into compliance with its own Constitution by having elections to fill vacant senate positions and to legitimize the 9 positions that were illegally appointed.
  • On December 6, 2009, Chair Brian Orser began the Senate meeting by saying that Senate's legitimacy was called into question.  Later that meeting, an ad hoc committee was formed to address these issues, handpicked by Treasurer Christopher Wohlers.  Twice, other Senators were blocked from joining the committee.

Last night, Senate voted to "approve" the 9 students who were illegally appointed.  I strenuously objected, on the grounds that it would be completely unconstitutional, anti-democratic, and illegitimate to do so.  I also stated that it would set the precedent that the Executive Board can appoint students to elected positions whenever it wants to, with no recourse.  A member of the ad hoc committee, Nick Tagliarino '11, said that the approval of those students would be a one-time fix to an undesirable situation, and the committee wouldn't endorse it as setting a precedent.

The approval of those 9 students passed anyway, with those 9 students voting in that very decision.

Then discussion turned to the Constitutional proposal.  Senate Chair Brian Orser opened the discussion, and I was the only one to raise my hand.  I asked in the plainest terms: what are the main objectives of the document?  Why, specifically, is it superior to the operative Constitution?  Who wrote it?
Nick Tagliarino spoke up and "objected" to my questions on the grounds that they had been answered during the first meeting in which it was proposed, back in November.
Official document author Liana Schecter said, essentially, that we had already discussed those things.
And with that, discussion ended.

Brian Orser began to initiate the vote proceedings.  I spoke up and said it would be a good idea to calculate the number of affirmative votes needed before the vote started, to preempt a procedural conflict.  Because there are so many vacant positions, there are only 36 sitting senators, by the Chair's count.  Therefore Orser placed the number of affirmative votes needed at 25.  (36*.67=24.12 --> 25)

The Chair began the role call vote as Secretary Buddy Bennett kept a running tally of votes on the chalkboard.  When Jasper Kosokoff's name was called, an email that he had sent ahead of time was counted as an affirmative vote.  The same happened for Marie Claire Burt.  A few students objected to that on the basis that the 'email privilege' wasn't made available to everyone.  I spoke up and said that it was not pre-announced that the proposal would come to a vote tonight.  Eleanor Green immediately spoke up and read from a section Robert's Rules that stated that vote by mail was allowed.  Based on a liberal reading of Robert's Rules, those two votes-by-email were counted.

After the Chair finished the roll call, the tally stood at 24 to 7 (or 8, it's unclear to me).

Brian Orser then yielded his position as chair to Christopher Coughlin, who is the Trustee Investment Senator and does not have a vote.  Brian cast his vote in favor of the proposal to reach 25 affirmative votes.

That's how the Constitutional proposal passed.

Not through consensus building.   Not through persuasion.  Not through community organizing.

No elections.  No letter writing.  No petitions.   No protests.   No debates.   No hearings.

5 people got elected 8 months ago, and managed to destroy a student government from the inside in order to force through an unproven, untested document that nobody can explain well. It's an embarrassment.

The current group of people currently masquerading as Senators just destroyed the trust Pitzer College places in students to participate in College Governance.  And they proved nothing except this:  the idea they are pushing must be so bad that they had to cheat to "pass" the proposal.

New Version of Constitutional Proposal!!!

The Constitution of Pitzer College Student Government

Preamble

While we recognize that in the life of the College, We the students of Pitzer College are but passing through, we assert that from the moment we arrive, this academy and its campus become our home, our community, and the foundation of our relationship with the world.  We, the student-people of Pitzer College, establish a new Student Government, founded upon the principles of direct democracy, the collective process of creation, freedom and autonomy, and the continuation of a dynamic student history which creatively joins Pitzer's past and future.  Because the decisions of the College will proceed with or without us, we must organize ourselves into a collective body in order to work alongside faculty and staff in actively creating and directing the future of the College and our community.
We are not a collection of atomized individuals.  Rather, we are an ecological student community, exemplifying mutualism, deep inter-relationality, multiplicity and complementarity.  Recognizing this reality, that the development of one of us depends upon the development of all, we find it necessary to construct a space for the collective process of this communal development.

Statement of Summary and Intention

Article 1.  Statement of Relationship of Pitzer Student Government to Pitzer College Governance and to Other Student Governments

The students of Pitzer College recognize the Pitzer College Student Government as the official body responsible for the formation, protection and implementation of the rights, decisions, and interests of the student body.  Pitzer College Student Government is the student aspect of Pitzer College Governance.  The Pitzer Student Government will collaborate with other student governments to advance the interests of the Pitzer College student body.

Article 2.  Bill of Student Rights

The Bill of Student Rights is an articulation of the rights of Pitzer College students as individuals and as a community, and of the rights of student organizations and Student Government.  The Student Government will protect and uphold these rights against any encroachments.
____________________
Structures of Government

Article 3.  The Office of Student Government

The Office of Student Government serves to coordinate, preserve and support Student Government, to support and unite student organizations, and to ensure and protect student participation in College Governance. The Officers will advocate for the rights, will, and decisions of the student body and Student Government, and will manage the Archives and Website of Student Government. The Officers will also support students and student groups in their interactions with the College Administration, and will facilitate the realization of students' demands.  The Officers will be five: the Convener, the Provost, the Archivist, the Web-Master, and the Financier.  As a sub-office, the Purse Strings is the primary resource for students seeking funding from institutional sources at Pitzer College.

Article 4.  The Assembly of Students

One student, one vote. Once a month, students will assemble at large, in order to discuss and address issues of the community and to steer the Student Government. The Assembly of Students will serve as the highest authority within Student Government and the heart of student action in College Governance. Relevant proposals which are approved by the Assembly will be placed on the College Council agenda. The Assembly of Students will choose two facilitators whose sole job is to ensure focus and fairness, and to draw out marginalized student voices. The Assembly of Students will reserve the right to recall and replace any elected student representation in Student Government.

Article 5. Pitzer Endowment for the Arts and Community Engagement

The  Pitzer Endowment for the Arts and Community Engagement serves to encourage and fund community initiatives and critical community engagement projects, and to foster art, music and creative free expression. The Pitzer Endowment for the Arts and Community Engagement will protect free expression and diverse community control of space on campus. The Pitzer Endowment for the Arts and Community Engagement will ensure that the policies and actions of the College support, encourage and allow for the free and full expression of a multiplicity of students.

Article 6. Academic Affairs Council

The Academic Affairs Council is charged with the development, articulation and coordination of a student agenda for the academy. The Council will be responsible for implementing this agenda through concerted cross-Committee action and for advocating for student interests in the academy.  This Council will discuss the ongoing considerations and decisions of College Governance and respond accordingly.

Article 7. Summit for Social Justice

The Summit for Social Justice  is a body which will facilitate collaboration between student groups engaged in a common struggle against interlocking systems of domination. The Summit recognizes that their respective social and political struggles are intimately intertwined and advocates for the active solidarity which emerges from this understanding.  The Summit will be a place for these organizations to recognize shared values and goals, take advantage of shared resources, collaborate, and acknowledge and discuss ideological consistencies and differences.  The Summit will engage in the construction of a statement of shared purpose, organize and collaborate in action, and empower and impassion each other.  The Summit will utilize funds for collaborative efforts between organizations.  The Summit will not necessarily be representative of the majority.

Article 8. Student Activities Committee

The Student Activities Committee is charged with the health and wealth of campus social life.  The Committee will fund both Five College and Pitzer social events.

Article 9. Hall Councils

The Hall Councils are the autonomous student governance bodies which aim to construct an ideal dorm life for the student residents. The Hall Council is a space in which the residents of a dormitory will govern residence life by protecting students' rights, administering dorm art policy, overseeing Residence Life policy and its implementation, and encouraging community through art, music and happenings. The Hall Council will work with staff of the college to ensure the health and saftey of their community.  The Hall Council will defend the freedom of the students to decide how they will conduct their lives and use the Residence Hall and their individual residences as their own homes.

Article 10. Student Organizations

Student organizations are recognized student groups which have coalesced around a particular statement of intention. These organizations will be responsible to fulfill the missions laid out in their charters and will participate variously in the Pitzer Endowment for the Arts and Community Engagement, the Academic Affairs Council, and the Summit for Social Justice .

Article 11. College Government

Pitzer College has a unique governance structure which integrates Students, Faculty, and Staff into a collective college governance process.  Pitzer Student Government is an autonomous body which fulfills the student aspect of College Governance.  The chief deliberative governance body of the college community is College Council.  Pitzer students are full and equal participants in College Council and College Committees.
__________________
Operations of Student Government

Article 12. Rules and Responsibilities of Membership

Members of the bodies of Student Government will advocate for the rights, needs and decisions of the student body, within and without the structures of College Governance and with the Administration of the College. While an individual cannot and should not attempt to objectively represent the views of the student body at large, the member should attempt to engage the student community on every issue.  Members will fully participate in College Governance toward the same end.

Article 13.  Community Representation

Community Representatives will be elected by and for particular constituencies within the student body.

Article 14.  Elections, Appointments & Recall

All elected members of student government will be nominated within the Assembly of Students.  Positions of special interest will be elected through a ballot.    All elected members of Student Government may be recalled by the Assembly of Students.  Special elections will be held for Officer and Committee positions if vacated and in the case of recall.

Article 15. Budgeting

The Student Government will budget the Student Activities Fees.  At the end of the Spring semester, the Assembly of Students will construct the following year’s annual budget, allocating funds to student organizations, the Pitzer Endowment for the Arts and Community Engagement, the Summit for Social Justice , Student Activities Committee and the Office of Student Government.  Funding will be allocated according to the priorities and values of the student body, considering the ways in which funds have been best used to enrich the community in the past.

Article 16. Amending the Constitution

The community’s relationship to Student Government will necessarily change over time.  As such, a continual reexamination of the Constitution of Pitzer College Student Government will allow for the continued health and relevance of the Student Government.  All amendments to the Constitution will be discussed and voted on by the Assembly of Students; amendments will also be put to a student-wide vote.

The Constitution of Pitzer College Student Government

Article 1.  Statement of Relationship of Pitzer College Student Government to Pitzer College Governance and to the Community

1.1 The students of Pitzer College recognize the Pitzer College Student Government as the official body responsible to construct full and meaningful student participation in all college governance decisions; to actively ensure that these college governance decisions are open, democratic, and transparent; to advocate for the full implementation and protection of the Bill of Student Rights and the rights and interests of the student as a full and autonomous member of the College community; to facilitate and create discourse on college governance and pressing community issues; to provide services to students; and to fund, support and create student organizations and initiatives.

Article 2.  Bill of Student Rights

2.1 The Bill of Student Rights will be written and established at the first meeting of the Assembly of Students.
2.2 Additional amendments to the Bill of Student Rights will be established in the same manner as other constitutional amendments.
2.3 Upon approval of the Bill, this Article will be replaced with the Bill of Student Rights.
__________________
Structures of Student Government

Article 3.  The Office of Student Government

3.1  From the Void sprang the Office of Student Government.
3.2 The Office of Student Government shall be the administrative and coordinative body within the Student Government.
3.3 Five Officers of Student Government will serve: Convener, Provost, Archivist, Web-Master, and Financier.
3.4 The duties of the Office of Student Government shall be:
a) To coordinate the structures of Student Government.
b) To ensure the integration of the Student Government into College Governance.
c) To maintain the membership, history, records and website of Student Government.
d) To coordinate and facilitate the elections and appointments of student representation in College Governance.
e) To report to the Assembly regarding the Officers' activities, the specifics and significance of their actions.
f) To hold weekly office hours for the student body.
g) To appoint eligible students to College Ad Hoc Committees.
h) To administer, to all of these ends, the Administrative Fund monies (See Article X, Budget).
3.5 The duties of each Officer of Student Government are as follows:
a) Convener (President): To coordinate communication between the various bodies of Student and College Government; to serve as the Student Government liaison to the College Council agenda planning meeting (Bylaws Article 2, Section 2.5) and other bodies of College Governance; to meet weekly with the President of the College (in conjunction with the Provost);, to actively pursue the implementation of all Student Government decisions; to attend the Assembly of Students; and to attend Student Government meetings.
b) Provost (President): To serve on the Budgetary Implementation Committee and the Trustee Budget Committee as an advocate in budgetary decisions which are in accordance with Pitzer's Core Values of Social Responsibility, Community, and Action, and which meet the needs of the student body; to advocate for the interests and decisions of the student body; to meet weekly with the President of the College (in conjunction with the Convener); to defend the rights of the Pitzer student, as defined in the Bill of Student Rights, the Faculty Handbook, and the Student Handbook; to advocate for the continued equal and directive participation of the student body in all decisions of the College; and to attend Student Government meetings.
c) Archivist (Secretary): To actively update and maintain the Archives of Student Government; and to ensure, in conjunction with the Web-Master, that the Archives will be hosted in full on the Student Government website.
d) Web-Master (Communications Director): To maintain and update the Student Government website; to announce in a 'College Committee Digest' email each weekend the meeting times and locations of all College Committees for the following week; to announce, via e-mail, at least two days prior, the meetings of the Academic Affairs Council, the Pitzer Endowment for the Arts and Community Engagement, Summit for Social Justice , Town Hall meetings, Assembly of Students, College Council, and special College Governance meetings.
e) Financier : To coordinate the Student Government monies, budgetary processes and Budgetary Bylaws; to process budgetary documents and compile information on the state of the budget.
3.6 The Office of Student Government shall have a dedicated office space, where the Officers of Student Government will hold their office hours and where the Archives of Student Government will be stored.
3.7 The Officers will meet at least weekly in order to effectively carry out their duties.
3.8 The Archives of Student Government will be managed by the Archivist, and each year will be continuously updated with: College Council Committee minutes, bylaws, reports, and supporting documents; College Council minutes, agenda, supporting documents; Strategic Planning documents; Master Plan and Residential Planning documents; Faculty Handbook; Student Handbook; the annual Budget of the College; the annual Budget of the Student Government; minutes from all Student Government Councils; minutes from every Pitzer student club and organization; documentation of every Student Government Forum; and a running list of every decision made by every College Governance body, with summary.
3.9 The Purse-Strings shall be the guiding and coordinating body for facilitating student access to the Student Government monies.
a) Six members will serve on the Purse-Strings: the Financier, the Class Representatives, and the New Resources Representative.
b) The Purse-Strings shall collaboratively guide any student seeking funds on campus. The members of the Purse-Strings shall make constructive recommendations to the funding seeker for the improvement of the request and direct the seeker to the appropriate bodies from which to seek money.
c) All funding proposals directed towards the Assembly of Students or Pitzer Endowment for the Arts and Community Engagement must be created in consulataion with the Purse-Strings.
d) The Purse-Strings shall hold accessible office hours in the office of the Student Government during which time the Purse-Strings shall meet with all seekers.
e) The processes and policies of the Purse-Strings shall be set out and determined by the Budgetary Bylaws.
3.10 Ambassadors of the Student Government of Pitzer College may be appointed by the Office of Student Government to serve at any school as liasons.
a) The Office has the right to appoint an ambassador from within the student body of Pitzer College to the student governments of the other members of the Claremont Consortium.
b) The role of the ambassadors will be to facilitate dialogue on issues of shared concern; to convey the messages, actions and requests of the Student Government; and to spread the spirit and values of the Pitzer College student body. All ambassadors will report to the Convenor and may be called to report to the Assembly upon the request of the Assembly.

Article 4.  The Assembly of Students

4.1 Once a month, students will assemble at large, in order to discuss and address issues of the community and to steer the Student Government. The Assembly of Students will serve as the highest authority within Student Government.  The Assembly of Students will reserve the right to recall any person elected by that body throughout the year as detailed in the Process of Assembly.
4.2  Stewards: The Stewards of the Assembly will be charged with the health and continuation of the Assembly of Students, each with the responsibility of encouraging the greatest possible participation of the student body. The Stewards will consist of: two Facilitators, two Historians, one Legislator, and one Town-Crier.
4.3 The duties of each Steward are as follows:
a) Facilitators: To run the Assembly according to the Process of Assembly; to facilitate a democratic and consensus-oriented process of community dialogue and decision-making; and to publicize the Assembly widely and thoroughly at least a week in advance of its meeting.  No more than one facilitator may be a man.
b) Historians: Each to record a complete narrative of the Assembly meeting, summarizing and attributing points articulated, capturing the flow of the meeting, noting decisions made and controversies, and to give these narratives to the Web-Master.
c) Legislator: To act in the Assembly as the authority on the Process of Assembly and on Student and College Governance; to solicit proposals for the Agenda via email; to assemble the Agenda of the Assembly prior to its meeting; and to record the official decisions of the assembly.
d) Town-Crier: To creatively and prominently announce the coming of the Assembly in the days prior to its meeting; to loudly announce the coming of the Assembly while ringing the Bell of Assembly through all campus residence halls and common space in the hour before the Assembly meeting;
4.4 A special Assembly of Students may be called by the Office of Student Government, the Stewards of the Assembly, or the Assembly of Students. A special Assembly may not be called less than 36 hours in advance.
4.5 College Council: Every decision of the Assembly which concerns the community as a whole, or which is dependent upon the cooperation of the Administration of the College, will be placed on the upcoming College Council agenda by the Student Government Convener. The Convener of the Student Government will relay these agenda items to the College Council Planning Committee.
4.6 Proposals: A proposal will be considered by the Assembly only once the proponent has discussed the issue with  enough students to gather six signatures of support. The proponent will then bring the proposal to the relevant Student Government Council for discussion, advice and support. The proponent will submit the proposal to the Legislator of the Assembly at least two days prior to the Assembly. Email notification will be sent, by the proponent, to the student body about the proposal prior to the Assembly.
4.7 Student Assembly Report: The Student Government Archivist will collate a document, the Student Assembly Report, which will contain: a report from the student members of each College Committee (Standing and Ad Hoc), a report from each Officer of Student Government, a report from each Hall Council, a report from each Council of Student Government, the proposed Agenda of the Assembly, the text of the proposals to be considered, and any relevant documents. Before the Assembly the Student Assembly Report will be sent to the student body. At the beginning of the Assembly, the Student Assembly Report will be available in paper format. At any time during the Assembly, an oral presentation of any of the reports in the Assembly Report can be requested.
4.8 Club Charters: The Assembly will consider for approval the charters of Pitzer clubs seeking official recognition.
4.9 Voting: Every Pitzer College student has a vote on the Assembly. The voting will take place as outlined in the Process of the Assembly.
4.10 The student governments of Claremont Graduate University, Claremont McKenna College, Harvey Mudd College, Pomona College and Scripps College may select a student of their respective schools to be a voting ambassador to the Assembly of Students.

Article 5. Pitzer Endowment for the Arts and Community Engagement

5.1  The Pitzer Endowment for the Arts and Community Engagement is charged with protecting, facilitating and invigorating the life of the student community.
5.2  The Pitzer Endowment for the Arts and Community Engagement will meet at least weekly.
a)  The weekly meeting will provide a space in which students can report on and coordinate the activities, project, and agenda of their respective groups, committees, and organizations.
5.3  The composition of the Pitzer Endowment for the Arts and Community Engagement is as follows:
a)  The following students are voting members of the Pitzer Endowment for the Arts and Community Engagement:  members of Campus Life Committee, all but one member of Campus Aesthetics Committee, one member of Diversity Committee, the 5 College Social Chair, the Student Activities Committee Representative, each Class Representative, the New Resources Representative, the Transfer Representative, the Off-Campus Representative and the International Representative.  The one member of Campus Aesthetics Committee who is not a voting member of the Pitzer Endowment for the Arts and Community Engagement will be a voting member of the Academic Affairs Council.  This member will be chosen from among the student members of the Campus Aesthetics Committee by the student members of the Campus Aesthetics Committee.
b)  All students are invited and encouraged to attend as full participants, but are non-voting members in the Pitzer Endowment for the Arts and Community Engagement.
c)  Non-students may attend as non-voting members whose participation is contigent upon the will of the student members of the Pitzer Endowment for the Arts and Community Engagement.
d) The Pitzer Endowment for the Arts and Community Engagement shall have the option, to be decided by majority vote, to hold a 'special meeting' in which only students or only Pitzer students may attend.
5.4  The student members will elect the officers of the Pitzer Endowment for the Arts and Community Engagement.
a)  One student member will be elected by the other members to act as facilitator and convener of each meeting of the Pitzer Endowment for the Arts and Community Engagement.  This student will ensure that meetings of the Pitzer Endowment for the Arts and Community Engagement are open, accessible, and well-publicized to the student body.  As convener and facilitator this student will ensure the meeting of the Pitzer Endowment for the Arts and Community Engagement and the faithful attendance of all members to its mission.
b)  One student member will be elected by the other members to act as secretary at each meeting of the Pitzer Endowment for the Arts and Community Engagement.  The secretary will render complete minutes of the Pitzer Endowment for the Arts and Community Engagement to the Archivist of the Offices of Student Government.
5.5  The Pitzer Endowment for the Arts and Community Engagement will administer the monies of the discretionary fund of Student Government. Five College funding is to be administered solely through Student Activities Committee (Art. 8).
5.6 The Pitzer Endowment for the Arts and Community Engagement will create a full voting representative member for each organization they have identified to be central to life of the community.
5.7  The Bylaws of the Pitzer Endowment for the Arts and Community Engagement:  The Pitzer Endowment for the Arts and Community Engagement will establish its own bylaws.  The bylaws of the Pitzer Endowment for the Arts and Community Engagement will concern but not be limited to: elections, quorum, establishment of regular meeting time and place, special meetings, membership, eligibility of membership, responsibilities, powers and duties of membership, attendance, recall for removal in the Assembly of Students, budgetary bylaws, voting and rules of order.

Article 6. Academic Affairs Council

6.1  The Academic Affairs Council is charged with coordinating a student agenda on academic issues, and advocating for student interests in the academy.
6.2  The Council will meet at least once every two weeks.
6.3  The composition of the Council is as follows:
a)  Student members on the following committees are full-time voting members whose attendance is necessary for the proper functioning of the Council:  Diversity, Academic Planning Committee, Appointments, Promotions, and Tenure, Faculty Executive Committee, Academic Standards Committee, Trustee Investment Representative, Teaching and Learning Committee, Curriculum Committee, and External Studies Committee.
b)  All students are invited and encouraged to attend as full participants, but non-voting members in the Council.
c)  Non-student members of the Pitzer community may attend as non-voting members whose participation is contigent upon the will of the student members of the Council.
d)  The Council shall have the option, to be decided by majority vote, to hold a 'special meeting' in which only students or only Pitzer students may attend.
6.4  The student members will elect the officers of the Council.
a)  One student member will be elected by the other members to act as facilitator and convener of each meeting of the Council.  This student will ensure that meetings of the Council are open, accessible, and well-publicized to the student body.  As convener and facilitator this student will ensure the meeting of the Council and the faithful attendance of all members to its mission.
b)  One student member will be elected by the other members to act as secretary at each meeting of the Council.  The secretary will render complete minutes of the Council to the Archivist of the Offices of Student Government.
6.5    The Bylaws of the Academic Affairs Council:  The Council will establish its own bylaws.  The bylaws of the Council will concern but not be limited to: elections, quorum, establishment of regular meeting time and place, special meetings, membership, eligibility of membership, responsibilities powers and duties of membership, attendance, recall for removal in the Assembly of Students, budgetary bylaws, and rules of order.

Article 7. Summit for Social Justice

7.1  The Summit for Social Justice  will be an autonomous body with a large degree of self-determination.
7.2  The Summit for Social Justice  will consist of representation from political and activist oriented organizations on campus.
7.3  The Summit for Social Justice  will meet at least monthly.
7.4  The budget of the Summit will be utilized solely for collaborative efforts between member organizations.
7.5  The Summit will elect a Convener and a Secretary at the beginning of each semester.
7.6  The Summit will work together to organize a conference, at least annually, on a specific topic of social, political, economic, or environmental justice and activism.  This conference will aim to address the topic from a multitude of perspectives.
7.7  Eligibility will be determined as follows:
a) Any Pitzer or Five College organization may bring an application for admission to the Summit.
b)  All applications for admission will be considered and voted on by the Summit.
c)  Active Pitzer clubs will have continuous membership into the next year.
d)  Five College clubs with a plurality of Pitzer student members will have continuous membership into the next year.
e)  Five College clubs without a plurality of Pitzer student members must reapply for membership at the beginning of each school year, with the criterion that these organizations share in the values of the Summit’s mission, that these organizations have an active presence within the Pitzer community and that the Pitzer community has an active presence within the organization.
7.8    Each member organization has one vote.
7.9    All students are welcome to attend Summit meetings as non-voting participants.
7.10  Non-student persons are welcome to attend Summit meetings with the permission    of the Summit.
7.11  The Bylaws of the Summit for Social Justice :  The Summit will establish   its own bylaws.  The bylaws of the Summit will concern but not be limited to: elections, quorum, establishment of regular meeting time and place, special meetings, membership, eligibility of membership, responsibilities powers and duties of membership, attendance, recall for removal in the Assembly of Students, budgetary bylaws, voting and rules of order.

Article 8. Student Activities Committe

8.1  The Student Activities Committee will administer funds to Five College social events and campus social events and will foster and encourage student art, music, performance, expression, and enjoyment.
8.2  The membership of the Student Activities Committee is as follows:  Class Representatives, Student Activities Committee Chair, Five College Social Chair, Student Activities Committee Representative, and any student who attends two meetings of Student Activities Committee.
8.3  The Student Activities Committee will establish its own bylaws.  The bylaws of the Committee will concern but not be limited to: elections, quorum, establishment of regular meeting time and place, special meetings, membership, eligibility of membership, responsibilities powers and duties of membership, attendance, recall for removal by the Assembly of Students, budgetary bylaws and rules of order.

Article 9. Hall Councils

9.1 Hall Councils serve to maintain, build and enliven the life of the residence halls and to discuss Residence Life policy and to oversee its implementation.
9.2 The Hall Councils administer their budgeted funds to this end.
9.3 The Hall Council is responsible to facilitate and advocate for artistic engagement with the built environment (e.g. painting, sculpture, installations, etc.). To this end, the Hall Council will write and maintain its own policies and procedures for art, interior and exterior, and display these prominently in the community (See the Pitzer College Outdoor Art Policy).
9.4 The Hall Council will oversee and maintain the common areas of the residence hall (e.g. kitchen, living rooms, rooftop patios, courtyards, etc).
9.5 The Hall Council will write and maintain a constitution which will govern its operations, and which will be published each semester.
9.6 Membership: All student residents of a residence hall are voting members of the Hall Council.

Article 10. Student Organizations

10.1 Student organized and managed groups may come to the Assembly of Students to present their charter and intention, and gain the approval of the Student Government as a recognized student organization.
10.2 Recognized student organizations may seek one-time funding through all available Student Government funding sources and annual funding within the budget of Student Government.
10.3 Recognized organizations will hold open, democratic meetings, and will send meeting minutes to the Archivist.
10.4 Student Cooperatives: Student Cooperatives are vital to the life of the community and the health of the College. A Student Cooperative is a democratic, student-run enterprise, providing a function or service which addresses a need of the community. The Student Government shall be committed to advocating for and supporting the creation of student-run cooperatives. The Assembly of Students will hear proposals for new student cooperatives, offering comment, support, advocacy, and initial funding.
10.4  Student organizations have certain entitlements.
a)  Student organizations have access to assistance from the Office of Student Affairs and the Office of Public Relations.
b)  Student organizations have official and public association with Pitzer College.

Article 11. College Governance

11.1 College Council Meeting: College Council is the deliberative governance body of the college community.
a) Students will constitute no less than one third of the votes in a College Council meeting.
b) The Convener of the Student Government will relay to the College Council Agenda Planning Meeting every decision of Student Government which concerns the community as a whole, or which is dependent on the cooperation of the Administration of the College.
c) The Pitzer Endowment for the Arts and Community Engagement, the Academic Affairs Council, and the Summit for an Egalatarian Society may also independently resolve to place an item on the College Council agenda.
11.2 Standing Committees of College Council and Other College Standing Committees:
a) The student members of standing College Council committees are elected by the Assembly.
11.3 Ad Hoc Committees: The student members of Ad Hoc Committees of College Council will be nominated by the Officers of Student Government and approved by a majority vote of either the Pitzer Endowment for the Arts and Community Engagement or the Academic Affairs Council according to relevance.
11.4 Trustee Committees:
a) The Convener will sit on the Trustee Student Life Committee and the Trustee Education Committee.
b) The Provost will sit on the Trustee Budget Committee and the Trustee Audit Committee.
c) A student will serve as representative to the Trustee Investment Committee.
11.5 Judicial Council representatives will be nominated in the Assembly of Students and elected by the entire student body as defined by the Election Bylaws.
__________________
Operations of Student Government

Article 12. Membership and Its Responsibilities

12.1 No student may serve on more than one College Standing Committee at a time.
12.2 Students may serve on College Ad Hoc and College Standing Committees simultaneously.
12.3 Students may serve in multiple Student and College Government positions, unless specifically prohibited.
12.4 The Officers of Student Government may not simultaneously serve as Stewards of the Assembly of Students.
12.5 The Convener, Provost, and Financier may not be elected or appointed to any other position in Student Government.
12.6  Any member of Student Government wishing to resign from their position must tender their resignation to the Assembly of Students for its acceptance.  The resignation will be an item on the agenda.  The Assembly must seek a replacement for the post immediately upon the acceptance of resignation.

Article 13.  Community Representation

13.1 Community Representatives will be nominated in the Assembly of Students and elected as defined by the Election Bylaws.
13.2 The Community Representatives shall be: Transfer Representative, International Representative, Environmental Representative, New Resources Representative, First Year Representative, Sophomore Representative, Junior Representative and Senior Representative.
13.3 The Community Representatives will be voting members of Pitzer Endowment for the Arts and Community Engagement.

Article 14. Elections, Appointments & Recall

14.1 Student members of standing Committees of College Council, the 5-C Social Chair will be nominated and elected in the Election Assembly. One third of the body may vote to send the election of a particular committee representative position to a campus-wide election.
14.2 Student members of ad hoc Committees of College Council will be nominated by the Officers of Student Government, and these nominations will be sent for a vote of confirmation in the relevant Council.
14.3 Facilitators and secretaries of the Council, Pitzer Endowment for the Arts and Community Engagement, and Summit will be chosen internally.
14.4 Recall: Any person elected by the Assembly may be recalled and replaced by the Assembly. The replacement will be made in an election in the Assembly, except in the case of the Officers, who must be replaced by Assembly nomination and campus-wide election.
14.5 Recall due to lack of attendance: The Chairs of College Council Standing Committees shall notify the Legislator and the Office of Student Government of significant lack of attendance by a student representative. The Legislator will place an item of recall and replacement on the agenda of the Assembly of Students, and will publicize the need for replacement. The recalled representative may address the Assembly in his or her own defense, and may run in the election to fill the position thus vacated.
14.6 Election Assembly: The March and December Assemblies of Students will be split between regular business and a special Election Assembly. The March Election Assembly will nominate and elect students to fill all positions in Student Government for the coming year. The December Assembly will nominate and elect students to fill positions to be vacated by students not returning for Spring semester. Students will nominate candidates for representation to Standing Committees of College Council and the Officers of Student Government. Elections for the representation to Standing Committees of College Council will be held in the Election Assembly. Elections for the Officers will be held in campus-wide ballot. Both elections and nominations are governed by the Election Guidelines and the Process of Assembly.

Article 15. Budgeting

15.1 The Annual Budget of Student Government will be decided in a special budget assembly which will occur as one section of the April Assembly of Students.  Budgeting will be conducted as described in the Process of Assembly.
15.2 Funding will be distributed according to the Budgetary Bylaws.
a) Funding will be allocated according to the priorities and values of the student body, considering past ways in which funds have best been used to enrich the community.
Article 16. Amending the Constitution
16.1 An amendment will be brought to two meetings of the Assembly of Students, first for a discussion and alteration, and again for discussion, alteration, and submission for a two thirds vote. A student-wide ballot must approve the amendment by simple majority.

December Debacles: Final Senate Meeting Part 1

This is a partial transcript from the final Senate meeting of the year on Sunday December 6, 2009.  My emphasis is supplied throughout the transcript, and my commentary is interspersed.

Senate Chair Brian Orser: [unintelligible] We need to finish before the end of the semester. To that end we need to deal with the issue of membership and the issue of our own legitimacy. There have been a lot of allegations made on the interwebs, about the senate, about this constitution being brought forward, about our current constitution, about the executive board of senate, and I’m not going to address all of those allegations in turn but there are a few primary issues. I’m not sure what’s going on behind me, does someone need to [unintelligible] ...

Those primary issues are this letter we received, they are our current constitution, and they are the bylaws of college governance. An incidental issue is the judicial council: its history and its [unintelligible]. Now we’ve been prompted by this letter from the dean of students to look into matters of compliance... I think there are enough people here who haven’t read this letter that I should probably read that letter.

Me, Your Humble Blogger: I have a question, I’m really sorry to interrupt you. Are we actually in discussion right now? Are we changing the order of the agenda?

BO: No, actually. I’m-- We don’t have normal status as a governing body right now; we need to address this before all other things. We cannot make decisions because the legitimacy of our government has been called into question. And as for the letter I’m about to read, our position in the college governance system is sort of questionable right now if you don’t mind.

I found this inaccurate and unnecessarily dramatic.  Senate has been terrible for the past semester, but to characterize it as illegitimate because Jim Marchant said so is ridiculous.

Sean Sullivan '10: If you don’t mind, can we just ask if people have read this letter, it’s a really long letter [unintelligible].

BO: I know for a fact that there are people here who haven’t.

I also found this annoying:  Orser essentially admits that he consults with certain Senators ahead of time, but not others.  Further evidence of this comes later.

Charles Butler '10: Then perhaps we might as well ask the author of this letter [Jim Marchant] to present it.

Charles points out that Dean of Students Jim Marchant was sitting in the room at the time, and I agreed with Charles: Jim Marchant would be the best person to explain the letter that he wrote and submitted.

BO: I would ask that I continue speaking without interruption for at least a few more minutes. If that’s okay. Thank you. The relevant section of the letter reads that there are certain positions which [unintelligible] people were appointed to standing committees of the college instead of being elected as required by the student senate constitution. Now those positions are indicated as one on academic planning, one on diversity, one on external studies, two on campus life, and all four of the aesthetics committee positions.

The issue here is that all of those positions are meant to be elected as per the current constitution of student senate. They were appointed by the executive board at the beginning of the semester. They should have been elected in the spring on the ballot upon which all of us were elected, but for legal reasons that ballot was incomplete.

(I don't know what "legal reasons" means in this context.)

BO: The ballot included the current constitution under which we are operating as well as the executed board. It also included several members who are on senate today. Most notably included Mr. [Hale] Shaw [’12] as sports representative, who no longer exists unfortunately as well as PAct representative position. Because the constitution, which changed the composition of senate, was on the same ballot as certain positions which were eliminated or changed, we have this issue. Hale’s disappeared.

The position of Sports Representative was added to Senate's composition two years ago, as an attempt to increase school spirit.  When we were revising the Senate Constitution last year, I don't recall anybody bringing it up.  Personally, I think Hale is a very smart and dedicated Senator and I value his input.  I think his talent is being wasted.  But when push comes to shove, his position doesn't exist, and Hale hasn't acted as a representative would be expected to.  He hasn't, to my knowledge, publicly solicited the input of Pitzer athletes, held athlete meetings, or brought sports-related issues to Student Senate.  If Brian is using this example as one of the terrible things that the existing Constitution has done, I think he should keep searching.

BO: Also, I believe Ms. [Meredith] Gabriel [’12] as a member, I believe her position has changed from elected to appointed. So she was elected to a position that became appointed.

This is exactly what should be happening all across Senate: we should elect students to every single position, even if it says in the Constitution that they should be appointed.  If there is anything positive that has come out of the larger debate about the new Constitutional proposal, it is that students want every position to be elected.

BO: Also, those elections did not include elections for judicial council as they should have.  We began the semester without judicial council appointments or elections.

And elections were never held, except for the First-Year Representative position, during the Fall semester.  I'll get into the judicial council debacle in another post.

BO: So that’s the context in which we find ourselves. The constitution under which we are currently operating also brought in in that same ballot, and that constitution is, in a certain sense, the point of this discussion.

The bylaws of faculty and student governance are the legally binding bylaws of faculty and student governance. They are made such by the bylaws of the College which indicates that they will be such. The bylaws of the Faculty and Student governance are in the faculty handbook alongside the governance section, section 4 of the faculty handbook, which is a sort of appendix on the composition of various committees, etc.

The issue here which I’ve been attempting to arrive at is that our current constitution is not actually congruous with the bylaws of faculty and student governance. In fact the constitution under which we are operating is in so many important ways, out of compliance with the bylaws of faculty and student governance that we find ourselves it seems in some sort of crisis:  What document is authoritative and what should be happening.

I will give a few illustrations: for example, Academic Planning Committee: as enumerated-- its membership as enumerated in the governance section 4 of the faculty handbook will be 4 appointed student members, yeah 4 appointed student members. In our current constitution, we read that there will be one elected position and two appointed positions.

So we have disagreement in number and what mode of selection. Now, this is a problem because there is disagreement. We cannot have a body which is constituted with disagreement, disagreeing documents. Now the reason that we have this situation, that we have this sort of disagreements is, is really unfortunate. Our current constitution was never taken to college council. Our constitution is actually not our official constitution. Two points on this. College council is the chief authority in the college governance system. But as far as we’re concerned, the college council is the highest body. The college council is the one that approves all changes to all of them--college governance.

Here is where I believe Brian is dramatically overstating the conflict.  Student autonomy is often stated as a core value of the college- the administrators and faculty don't care how we conduct ourselves as a body except when it interferes with larger processes of College governance.   The only reason Jim Marchant sent his letter to Student Senate asking it to comply with its own rulebook is when Executive Board illegally appointed several people to positions that are required to be elected.

And you know, this sounds technical, okay so, let’s just take our current constitution to college council. Unfortunately that won’t actually fix the issue, because the reason we have this issue is that if our current constitution had been taken and directly approved-- by this body and the student body-- had been taken to college council, they would have said sorry, it’s going to be a much longer process for you.  You need to make sure that your document and the bylaws of the college are in agreement. We could -- our current student senate constitution to the college council.

Now, that leaves us in a little bit of a bind, because in the faculty and student governance bylaws, it indicates that the constitution of student senate will be the student senate constitution found in the faculty handbook. There’s actually a legally resting place for our constitution. I can’t change some words and the cover page and say that it’s our constitution. Unfortunately, and I talked to professor [Stuart] McConnell about this, who spearheaded provisions of the faculty handbook, unfortunately because student senate is a very student sort of thing, they didn’t look at any of the sections pertaining to students.

December Debacles: Senate Catch-up Part 1

Around the time Senate stuff really hit the fan, I frankly stopped being useful to readers because I prioritized my personal involvement in Senate dealings over reporting those dealings.  But Winter Break is providing an opportunity to backtrack and piece together the chain of events.

My interpretation is this:

In the wake of the proposal of the new Constitution, debates among many students in many different fora were getting intense.  What put those debates on hold was an email sent to Student Senators by Dean Marchant, which asserted that Student Senate wasn't following its own guidelines in the makeup of its representatives.

His reasoning was that because those representatives interact with larger College Governance structures, they have to be put in place through the methods prescribed in the Student Senate Constitution.

In other words, students were appointed by the Executive Board to fill positions that must be elected and Senate has to correct that.

Senate Chair Brian Orser appeared to freak out about that, and attempted to call a College Council meeting.  Because he didn't go through the proper channels, and because he wanted to hold it late on a Friday night, nobody took it seriously.

He then postponed his call for the meeting until Thursday, December 10th.  Nobody took that seriously, either.  No one cancelled the meeting, but to my knowledge nobody showed up to it.

The primary sources are in chronological order below (I've highlighted the most essential parts of each document):

December 2, 2009:  Dean of Students Jim Marchant sends the following email:

Dear Members of Student Senate:

Normally I prefer to initiate communication about important issues in-person with individuals or groups directly involved.  However, given my experiences thus far this semester and due to time constraints, I find myself in the position of having to communicate this message to you, the larger Senate body, in writing without prior discussion.

As you know, one of the most distinctive and special characteristics of Pitzer is its governance system and the critical role that students play in it.  We are one of the very few institutions of higher education in the world that include, in fact welcome and value, students in the decision-making process at all levels.  My colleagues and I have heard consistently from students over the years that they appreciate the opportunity to be involved in College governance in such a meaningful way.  Lately however, we have been approached by many students who have questions and concerns about the role of students in governance at Pitzer.  As such, I am writing to you with the intent of clarifying and hopefully resolving some of the issues that have been raised.

I understand you are planning to hold elections to fill the vacant positions for Judicial Council, Environmental Senator, and Off-Campus Representative.  It is good to know that you are going forward with this, especially since none of the five Judicial Council positions are currently occupied.  However, I believe it is important to recognize that according to the Student Senate Constitution (attached) there are actually many more elected positions that need to be filled at this time.  It is in best interest of Student Senate and all Pitzer students to fill these positions in accordance with the Senate Constitution.

Below is a copy of the results from last spring’s elections as reported by the Secretary of Student Senate in April.  In addition to the Executive Board positions and the Sports Representative, I noticed that this election confirmed the approval of the amended Senate Constitution.  Furthermore, I believe the Senior Class Representative was selected in a subsequent election and several appointed positions were filled.  This fall there was an election for the First-Year Class Representative, but not for any of the other vacant positions to my knowledge.  In the meantime, there appear to be many instances of students being appointed to standing committees of the College this semester instead of being elected as required by the Student Senate Constitution.

A list of the College’s standing committees with the number of appointed and elected student positions for each according the current Student Senate Constitution is below.  According to my calculations, in addition to the positions you are already planning to hold elections for (which includes the 5 vacant Judicial Council positions), there are 9 others that need to be filled via elections: one each on APC, Diversity, and External Studies, two on Campus Life, and all four Aesthetics Committee positions. Since these committees apparently have the total number of allotted student representatives assigned to them at this time, a determination needs to be made as to which appointed students need to step down because they are currently occupying positions that require an elected student representative.  For example: 5 students have been appointed to the Campus Life Committee; 2 will need to step down and be filled with 2 elected student representatives.

Committee                                                                                Appointed                  Elected

Academic Planning 2 1
Academic Standards 3 0
Appts., Promotion and Tenure 2 (Jr. and Sr.) 0
Budgetary Implementation 1 (Vice Chair) 0
Campus Life Committee 3 2
Curriculum Committee 2 0
Diversity Committee 2 1
External Studies Committee 2 1
Faculty Executive Committee 2 (Jr. and Sr.) 0
Campus Aesthetics Committee 0 4

Please know that this is not a commentary about the suitability of the students currently serving on these committees.  Rather, this is notification that many student positions on College standing committees have not been filled in compliance with the Student Senate Constitution.

Also, contrary to what my colleagues and I have heard and read in more than one venue recently, my office never agreed to the appointments that were made to the Judicial Council earlier this semester.  Below is an excerpt from an email that I sent to the Student Senate Chair on September 23, 2009.  This email was copied to Associate Dean of Students Chris Freeberg.

On another matter, I appreciate you and Paul providing a list of students that were appointed to the Judicial Council by Student Senate.  As I mentioned when we met, I needed to check the most recent version of the Student Senate Constitution to verify that students could be appointed.  I have since reviewed the Constitution and it states that all 5 student Judicial Council members are elected.  I’m sure you already have it, but I have attached a copy of what I understand to be the current Constitution.  Please let me know if you have a different understanding of this. Also, at this time we do not have any judicial cases pending, but it will be important to fill these positions soon.

No response to this email was ever received.  Again, to my knowledge, no elections have been held to fill these positions or the many other elected student positions (other than the First-Year Class Representative), despite the fact that the current Student Senate Constitution states that elections must be held within the first 3 weeks of the fall semester.

It is the responsibility of Senate to ensure that the current policies and procedures that address student participation in College governance (i.e. the Senate Constitution) are followed.  If they are not, then students are denied the unique opportunity to participate in Pitzer’s governance system in meaningful ways.  Basically, non-compliance with the Senate Constitution undermines the voice of all students at all levels of governance of the College and brings into question the decision-making authority and legitimacy of Student Senate.

Finally, it is important to know that a new or amended Senate Constitution cannot be decided upon until there is compliance with the current one.  As it stands now, since Senate is currently out of compliance with the Constitution, the decisions made by the current Senate body carry no authority in the College’s governance system.

I believe this issue can be addressed soon by holding elections for all of the elected positions as required by the Senate Constitution.  As always, my office is willing to provide assistance as needed.

Sincerely,

Jim Marchant
Dean of Students
Vice President for Student Affairs

December 2, 2009: Senate Chair Brian Orser attempts to call a College Council meeting for Friday December 4 at 9:15 pm.

Pitzer College Community:

I am writing in response to a recent incident, which has raised an urgent question for Student Senate.  Pursuant to Article II, Section 2.4 of the Bylaws of Faculty and Student Governance, I am formally calling an emergency meeting of College Council. As per Section 2.4, this meeting will take place no less than 48 hours from the time at which this email is sent (approximately 9:15 pm, Friday the 4th of December). I am sympathetic with the multiple demands on the time of our students and faculty; I would prefer to hold this meeting earlier, on Thursday or Friday. However, the 48 hour restriction would need to be waived for us to do so. Under no condition should this meeting be held after this Sunday.

This meeting, Friday December 4th at 9:15pm, will be held for the entire community to discuss an urgent issue of Student Government at Pitzer College.  The only item on the agenda, as of now, will be a discussion of the membership and legitimacy of the current Student Senate.

Respectfully Submitted,
Brian Orser

December 3, 2009: President Laura Trombley politely rejects Brian's unilateral authority to call a Council meeting.

Dear Pitzer Community,

An email was sent last night by Brian Orser, President of Student Senate, calling for a College Council to take place on Friday evening at 9:15 pm.  In order for a College Council to be called, the following steps must be taken pursuant to sections 2.3, 2.4, 2.5, and 2.7 of the Bylaws of Faculty, Staff, and Student Governance:

-The College Council meeting shall convene at the call of the President, the Dean of Faculty, the Chairperson of the Executive Committee of the Faculty, the President of Student Senate, or the Convener of the Staff Council Representatives.

-All members of the faculty and Student Voting Members shall be expected to attend such meetings.

-College Council meetings shall be held as needed but no less than once per semester. One week's notice of a meeting shall normally be given and in no case may a College Council meeting be called on less than 48 hours notice.

-The (College Council) Agenda shall normally be prepared by the Dean of Faculty in consultation with the Chairperson of the Executive Committee of the Faculty, the President of Student Senate, the Convener of the Staff CouncilRepresentatives, and the President.

-The Agenda will normally be published at least 48 hours in advance of the College Council meeting.

-College Council can only be held if there is a Quorum:  While classes are in session, a quorum shall consist of no fewer than one half of the voting members of the College Council meeting, providing that this includes no fewer than one-half of the voting members of the faculty not on leave. While classes are not in session, a quorum shall consist of no fewer than one-half of the voting members of the faculty not on leave. (Voting members of College Council for fall 2009 are 64 faculty, 21 students, and 15 staff; 64 faculty are all voting faculty minus the Dean, 21 students are 1/3 of the voting faculty, and 15 staff are all Staff Council Representatives.)

-The President shall preside at College Council meetings. In the absence of the President, the Dean of Faculty shall preside. In the absence of both the President and the Dean of Faculty, the Chairperson of the Executive Committee of the Faculty shall preside.

On Monday of this week the incoming Chairperson of the Executive Committee of the Faculty, the Associate Dean of Faculty representing the Dean, the President of Student Senate, the Convener of the Staff Council Representatives, the President, and the Secretary of College Council met in person in the President’s office and agreed that because there was no pressing business, College Council would not be held this week Thursday, December 3 at 4:15 pm (a time traditionally held so staff are not asked to attend outside of normal work hours).  The President of Student Senate did not consult with these individuals before calling for College Council via email.  As well, he did not consult with the three individuals able to chair College Council (the President, the Dean of Faculty or the Chairperson of the Executive Committee of the Faculty).  If the President of Student Senate would like to call a College Council for next week Thursday, December 10, President Trombley would be happy to contact the Dean of Faculty, the Chairperson of the Executive Committee of the Faculty, the Convener of the Staff Council Representatives and the President of Student Senate to meet and discuss.

Sincerely,

Laura Trombley, President
Alan Jones, Dean of Faculty
Ethel Jorge, Chairperson of the Executive Committee of the Faculty
Angel Jauregui, Convener of the Staff Council Representatives

December 4, 2009: Brian Orser moves his call for a College Council meeting to December 10, 2009.

Pitzer College community:

On Wednesday night, in response to an email sent by the Dean of Students to the Student Senators, and as per Article II, Section 2.4 of the Bylaws of Faculty and Student Governance, I called a College Council meeting to be held at the soonest possible time. Because of the dramatic implications for Student Governance and the urgency of the situation, I determined that the community must immediately discuss the assertions made by the Dean of Students in his email.

However, in the time since I called the College Council meeting, I have communicated with dozens of faculty and administrative staff members, and have determined that in spite of the gravity of the situation it will be difficult to attain a College Council quorum this weekend.

For this reason, I am postponing the College Council meeting until next week. Because the urgency of the situation will be less after this Sunday's Student Senate meeting, I believe we can afford to wait until the traditional time reserved for college governance. I am rescheduling this College Council meeting for Thursday, Dec 10th, at 4:15pm in the Founder's Room.

Respectfully,
Brian Orser

December 5, 2009: FEC Chair Ethel Jorge rejects call for College Council meeting.

Dear Brian,

In response to the request of the Student Senate Executive Committee, the FEC has determined that the issue brought before it was primarily one that concerned the students and that it was not appropriate or respectful to intervene because that would change the dynamics of the process.

Second, FEC's understanding of Jim Marchant's memo was that it did not invalidate decisions the Senate had made to date and did not refuse to recognize the Senate as a legitimate body to conduct elections.

FEC's considered advice is that the Senate hold elections as soon as possible in order to be in compliance with their constitution passed last spring.

Best wishes in your endeavors.

Ethel Jorge
FEC Co-chair.

Well Hello There, Port Side

Jonathan Hirsch of The Port Side gives me a sense of what this whole Senate debacle looks like to an outside observer [blogger's emphasis supplied]:

Jasper [...] has spent a considerable amount of time recounting the shenanigans of Pitzer’s student government, led by the so-called “Vanguard.” According to Jasper, there is a proposal to essentially rewrite the Pitzer Student Government Constitution currently being debated. [...] If adopted, I would lose respect for Pitzer’s student body and I assume that any prospective student who was searching the Pitzer student government site would too. Below are some of the highlights. I’ll try to refrain from commentary. The ridiculousness speaks for itself.

To be honest, there are a lot of "shenanigans" that I haven't yet (un?)covered in this space.  It became very difficult when I was often personally involved in dealing with Senate stuff while being a first-year mentor, studying for the LSAT, and trying not to fail out of school.  Topics include:

  • The Judicial Council debacle, in which the Vanguard attempted to make secret appointments to the college's judicial committee.
  • The Vanguard's many secret, unconstitutional appointments to Student Senate.
  • Dean of Students Jim Marchant's email that called for Student Senate to start following its own Constitution.
  • Senate Chair Brian Orser's call for a College Council meeting, which was smacked down by President Laura Trombley.
  • An open discussion which explored implementing the ideas contained in the new Constitutional proposal through a series of less disruptive Constitutional amendments (led by your humble blogger)
  • Senate Chair Brian Orser's second call for a College Council meeting, which nobody ever canceled (or showed up to).
  • Senate Chair Brian Orser's dramatic monologue during the semester's final Student Senate meeting, saying that he wasn't sure if there was a legitimate Student Senate.
  • My thoughts on Arthur Levine's resignation.

I hope to have these episodes detailed before the start of the spring semester.  Thanks for reading, Jonathan, but it's only going to get weirder.  Stay tuned.

First-Year Rep Admits Wrongdoing, Resigns

This morning First-Year Representative Arthur Levine '13 sent the following email to student-talk, announcing his resignation from his position.  You may remember September's botched election and Arthur's victory in the re-do election.  [Author's hyperlinks have been omitted; blogger's emphasis supplied]:

http://static.newworldencyclopedia.org/thumb/1/11/Panopticon.jpg/250px-Panopticon.jpg
Dear First year students and Pitzer community. I would like to announce my resignation from the Pitzer student senate. I would also like you to read this as I have laid out some reasons, opinions, reflections, and other words. I have also included a link to a wonderful documentary called Beyond Elections. I also recommend Why We Fight to anyone interested in government or your own survival. Please watch these and maybe you will understand why I have left my position. I just could not devote any of myself to something that I do not believe in.

First I would like to thank you all who voted to elect me. For those of you who I spoke to while I was campaigning you may remember that I was running with the idea that representative democracy was ridiculous: that people should represent themselves and be welcomed by their government to do so. This alone is the reason why I have never voted in senate I am sorry that I did not better fulfill my duties as First-year Rep, but I guess that I was trying to make a point. SOmetimes your representatives do not represent you. Many times representatives are bought by corporate lobbyists to fulfill corporate agendas for world domination. Do not be fooled by rhetoric or promises, your voice is not the loudest or most important to the government in this country. We have to change that. In the same way as some reps in the U.S. government have ulterior motives for their votes I too had an agenda. I was asked to be a rep so that I could vote yes to the new Constitution. Although I completely support the new constitution, as it would create the type of government I would rather see, I have come to realize that my participation in senate is exactly what I do not want to see in politics: a person acting as a widget or a lever puller or a whole puncher. My sole purpose was to raise my hand one time and vote yes. I dehumanized myself. OOOPS, pretty easy these days. There should be an assembly like is proposed in the new constitution, but I do not want to continue to waste my time doing something that does not make me feel happy or healthy. I would rather be one of the people than one of them up there in the founder's room debating garbage.

Anyway, sorry is my main point. I should really apologize to myself for going against my gut. I have learned a lot about Pitzer from my experiences and anyone who would like to talk about it is welcome to speak to me, but as a person not your rep, which I unfortunately pretended to be. Sorry to anyone who was expecting more of me. I guess I made a lot of mistakes this semester. My bad.

Here is some good shit to read by the way. Perhaps a reflection on senate.

Wait-how could that be, that disaster are the apex of adventure, community, life itself? Does that mean that if we really want to live, we have to spend our lives as disastourists, quixotically chasing the few brief moments of upheaval destiny affords each of us, longing for the fleeting, borrowed wings of destruction and rebirth as we wade through the years of deadening routine in the mean time? Is that practical, praticable, worthwhile? Does the woman fed up with her car payments and marriage really crave tornadoes and typhoons, or is she just desperate for an honorable way out?

Perhaps we have everything backwards here-maybe disasters aren't so great after all, but the real Disaster, the worst one, is the Disaster we live everyday: the emptiness of our full schedules, the trivia that trivializes us, the machinery that runs on rivers of blood. That would explain why e feel so free whenever something, anything, however dangerous or difficult, interrupts all this. Perhaps the excitement and immediacy that break out in emergencies are simply indications of a return to our natural state, in the break they herald from the full scale slow motion train wreck that is our society. If that is the case, then it is not disaster per se that are liberating - it is rather, a question of perspective: a "disaster" that disrupts a life of constraint is experienced as a moment of liberation, when that "normal life" is actually Disaster in disguise.

Most of the disasters we really suffer from can be traced to this invisible Disaster, anyway. The destruction of rain forests and the ozone layer, holocausts perpetuated with biological weapons and smart bombs, even global pandemics like mad cow disease, anorexia, bulimia, depression - these would not be possible without centralized state and corporate power, and the meaningless busywork of billions that engenders it. To live with the unknown ahead of and around us, to struggle only with the "natural disasters" our ancestors faced, would almost be adyllic after all this.

Could we fight Disaster with disaster? If we stopped feeding its flames with our hard work and attention, if we ceased paying tribute, the Disaster would surely crash and burn once and for all. If this status quo is the ultimate Disaster if it really is disorder and tragedy normalized as a system, no lower-case disaster could be worse, Interrupt the the Disaster!

Some of us are already practicing this. We don't live in the Disaster, but in encampments at its edge-yes, in a state of ongoing disasters and difficulties, but nothing compared to the misery of life in the Disasters area proper. We don't fall for popular propaganda about disasters; we're conducting our own experiments with them. We don't have to wait for catastrophe to strike to enjoy its benefits-we can throw a disaster anytime we like. And we are.

--Disastrounaunts Dilemma Goldman and Calamity Jane of CrimetInc Collective

Anyway enjoy the time away from the prison(remind you of the first year dorms at all)/school
--
Arthur Levine

Constitutional History

This has been a busy and difficult week for me and I haven't written anything in this space since the Sunday night Senate meeting; apologies to those who were depending on PUnc for breaking news.

This debate has many different primary and secondary issues, so I am going way back to the beginning.  Since the new proposal, assertions have been made and questions have been asked about both the existing and proposed Constitutions.  Here is my account of the most recent amendment

Last fall, I served on Senate Executive Board.  During the course of the year, I noticed that during meetings and other discussions, the Constitution was hindering progress rather than guiding it.  It was confusingly written and included structures that we didn't use anymore.  In my capacity as Communications Secretary, I wanted to improve communication about the functions of our government.

So when somebody stood me up for a meeting at the Motley, I ordered a cup of something hot, opened up my laptop, and settled in for the evening.  The first thing I did was add a table of contents.  Then I fixed the typos. But in the course of reading through the whole thing,

I realized that it would need a more serious revision.

At 2:38 pm on November 22, 2008, I sent out an email to all Senators with my working draft.  In that email I described it as "My own little ongoing project of getting our Constitution to actually describe how Senate works."

During the next days and weeks, I solicited input from every senator via email.  5 new senators had just been appointed and elected, and I made sure to email them too.  I held meetings anyone who asked to meet with me, and solicited the input of people directly involved with sections of the Constitution that I felt required expansion:

I asked sitting Senate Chair Shatara Ford '09 for her input on the Teaching and Learning Committee.  I met with Asia Bennett '11 over lunch in McConnell.  I met with Daniela Kronenberg '11 to improve the section on the Student Activities Committee.  I met with Nicole Scheunemann '10 to codify the Environmental Senator position.  Jesse Meisler-Abramson '11 pointed out several typos that I subsequently fixed.  Sitting Treasurer Carter Rubin '09 walked me through the budgetary processes he had become expert at, and we worked together to improve the Budget and Finance Article.  Sean Sullivan '10 and I met at least 3 times to discuss the best mechanisms for increasing senator accountability.

I also wanted to give Student Senate a clearer purpose.  So I set about writing a preamble that I hoped would clarify our goals as an assembly of students.  On December 1, 2008, I distributed an early draft of the following paragraph to all senators and asked for help with it [current emphasis supplied]:

The Pitzer College Student Senate is hereby recognized by Pitzer College students as the official body for protecting student rights and interests, facilitating student participation in College policy-making, increasing the quality of students’ educational and academic experience, upholding the core values of the College in all areas of student life, facilitating communication between students and faculty, staff, and bureaucratic organizations, recognizing and funding student organizations, representing the student body in College Council meetings and all official college business, and striving to improve the welfare of students.

On December 7, 2008, I got on the meeting agenda and opened up the draft to the Senate floor.  I explained my original intentions and invited input from everyone who was there.  On the same day, I sent the proposal to student-talk and asked for comments or input.  I got a lot of positive responses from students who weren't on Senate but appreciated an improved student government.

On December 14, 2008, Senate had what would prove to be its final discussion of the document.  I elaborated on the sections that were more significantly expanded upon, and answered all questions asked. During the meeting there was a thorough discussion. A few senators voiced their concerns about one aspect of the proposal, which were incorporated into the terminal version.  It was approved with overwhelming support. A few months later, the Constitution was approved by the Student Body via ballot.

Why should you care about any of this?

There are two things that I want you to take away from this post:

1.  I'm proud of the work I did last fall, but it's not "Amy Jasper's Constitution".  I don't think of it that way and you shouldn't, either.  The Constitution I revised had been continuously adapting and changing for 15 years ((according to Senate Chair Brian Orser, who seemed to have special knowledge of it at last Sunday's Senate meeting)).   Every single senator and student had the opportunity to contribute to the discussion.  Many people did contribute and I incorporated their changes.

2.  The changes I made were not controversial: the structure and operating procedures of our governance system were barely tweaked.  Yet it still took weeks of collaboration, and months until the Student Body approved the update.  I didn't impose a deadline on the project because I felt that these things deserve time and careful consideration.

After Thanksgiving break I look forward to engaging with the text of the new proposal, but right now the number one thing I worry about is this proposal getting pushed through prematurely, with disastrous results.  The proposal on the table entails TOTAL demolition of current governance structures. That's cool with me- I think it's clear to everyone that Student Governance needs reform.  But--

There is a lot at stake:  Let's go slowly, and let's go together.

Constitutions, Continued

From the existing Constitution (the one we took months to vet and that was approved by the student body).  My emphasis supplied:

ARTICLE IX. CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT.
Section 1. Notice.
Amendments must be discussed during at least two separate full Student Senate Meetings. Proposed amendments must be distributed to each member of Student Senate at least 36 hours before official discussion and proposal.

Communications Secretary Leah Kahn released the Senate agenda email to the list-serv at 7:18 am on Saturday morning.  She then sent the email distributing the actual amendment at 8:19 am.  [quote]

Its subject line was "oops!" and it contained the message "Oops! I forgot to attach this."

I don't believe for one damn second that Leah actually forgot to include the attachment of the biggest change to Pitzer student governance structure in 25 years.  (Does anybody?)

The only conclusion we can come to is that the authors of the amendment weren't ready to send it on time.

If the group of people who wrote this amendment didn't even finish writing it until after 6:30 am on Saturday, how can we be expected to read it, process it, analyze it, discuss it, debate it, and improve it?

Now that we are faced with a new Constitutional proposal, one with almost 6,000 words, 35 different sections, and little resemblance to existing structures at Pitzer or any other liberal arts college of which I'm aware, my only hope that we can give it the consideration it requires.

If the Amendment is pushed through before Winter Break:

IT.  WILL.  FAIL.

Proposal for a Completely Different Constitution

Big news:

According to Exec Board Secretary Leah Kahn's email, during the upcoming Senate meeting Lianna Schechter '10, Jerzy Kaufmann '11, and Jasper Kosokoff '10 will be proposing a Constitutional amendment that will, in practice, replace the existing Constitution.  The Amendment follows here; I haven't modified it except to bold Section and Article titles:

The Constitution of Pitzer College Student Government

Preamble

While we recognize that in the life of the College, We the students of Pitzer College are but passing through, we assert that from the moment we arrive, this academy and its campus become our home, our community, and the foundation of our relationship with the world. We, the student-people of Pitzer College, establish a new Student Government, founded upon the principles of direct democracy, the collective process of creation, freedom and autonomy, and the continuation of a dynamic student history which creatively joins Pitzer's past and future. Because the decisions of the College will proceed with or without us, we must organize ourselves into a collective body in order to work alongside faculty and staff in actively creating and directing the future of the College and our community.

We are not a collection of atomized individuals. Rather, we are an ecological student community, exemplifying mutualism, deep inter-relationality, multiplicity and complementarity. Recognizing this reality, that the development of one of us depends upon the development of all, we find it necessary to construct a space for the collective process of this communal development.

Statement of Summary and Intention

Article 1. Statement of Relationship of Pitzer Student Government to Pitzer College Governance and to Other Student Governments

The students of Pitzer College recognize the Pitzer College Student Government as the official body responsible for the formation, protection and implementation of the rights, decisions, and interests of the student body. Pitzer College Student Government is the student aspect of Pitzer College Governance. The Pitzer Student Government will collaborate with other student governments to advance the interests of the Pitzer College student body.

Article 2. Bill of Student Rights

The Bill of Student Rights is an articulation of the rights of Pitzer College students as individuals and as a community, and of the rights of student organizations and Student Government. The Student Government will protect and uphold these rights against any encroachments.

____________________

Structures of Government

Article 3. The Office of Student Government

The Office of Student Government serves to coordinate, preserve and support Student Government, to support and unite student organizations, and to ensure and protect student participation in College Governance. The Officers will advocate for the rights, will, and decisions of the student body and Student Government, and will manage the Archives and Website of Student Government. The Officers will also support students and student groups in their interactions with the College Administration, and will facilitate the realization of students' demands. The Officers will be five: the Convener, the Provost, the Archivist, the Web-Mage, and the Treasurer. As a sub-office, the Purse Strings is a primary resource for students seeking funding from institutional sources at Pitzer College

Article 4. The Assembly of Students

One student, one vote. Once a month, students will assemble at large, in order to discuss and address issues of the community and to steer the Student Government. The Assembly of Students will serve as the highest authority within Student Government. The Assembly of Students will serve as the heart of student action in College Governance. Relevant proposals which are approved by the Assembly will be placed on the College Council agenda. The Assembly of Students will choose two facilitators whose sole job is to ensure focus and fairness, and to draw out marginalized student voices. The Assembly of Students will reserve the right to recall and replace any elected student representation in Student Government.

Article 5. Society of Friends and Lovers (Student Life Council)

The Society of Friends and Lovers serves to encourage and fund community initiatives, critical community engagement projects, and to foster art, music and creative free expression. The Society will protect free expression and diverse community control of space on campus. The Society will ensure that the policies and actions of the College support, encourage and allow for the free and full expression of a multiplicity of students.

Article 6. Council for the Co-Construction of Knowledge (Academic Affairs Council)

The Council for the Co-Construction of Knowledge is charged with the development, articulation and coordination of a student agenda for the academy. The Council will be responsible to implement this agenda through concerted cross-Committee action and to advocate for student interests in the academy. This Council will discuss the ongoing considerations and decisions of College Governance and respond accordingly.

Article 7. Summit for an Egalitarian Society

The Summit for an Egalitarian Society is a body which will facilitate collaboration between student groups engaged in a common struggle against interlocking systems of domination. The Summit recognizes that their respective struggles are intimately intertwined and advocates for the active solidarity which emerges from this understanding. The Summit will be a place for these organizations to recognize shared values and goals, take advantage of shared resources, collaborate, and to acknowledge and discuss ideological consistencies and differences. The Summit will engage in the construction of a statement of shared purpose, organize and collaborate in action and empower and impassion each other. The Summit will utilize funds for collaborative efforts between organizations, with a particular emphasis on inviting people to speak. The Summit will not necessarily be representative of the majority.

Article 8. Student Activities Committee

The Student Activities Committee is charged with the health and wealth of campus social life. The Committee will fund both Five College and Pitzer social events.

Article 9. Hall Councils

The Hall Councils are the autonomous student governance bodies which aim to construct an ideal dorm life for the student residents. The Hall Council is a space in which the residents of a dormitory will govern residence life by protecting students' rights, administering dorm art policy, overseeing Residence Life policy and its implementation, and encouraging community through art, music and happenings. The Hall Council will defend the freedom of the students to decide how they will conduct their lives and use the Residence Hall and their individual residences as their own homes.

Article 10. Student Organizations

Student organizations are recognized student groups which have coalesced around a particular statement of intention. These organizations will be responsible to fulfill the missions laid out in their charters and will participate variously in the Society of Friends and Lovers, the Council for the Co-Construction of Knowledge, and the Summit for an Egalitarian Society.

Article 11. College Government

Pitzer College has a unique governance structure which integrates Students, Faculty, and Staff into a collective college governance process. Pitzer Student Government is an autonomous body which fulfills the student aspect of College Governance. The chief deliberative governance body of the college community is College Council. Pitzer students are full and equal participants in College Council and College Committees.

__________________

Operations of Student Government

Article 12. Rules and Responsibilities of Membership

Members of the bodies of Student Government will advocate for the rights, needs and decisions of the student body, within and without the structures of College Governance and with the Administration of the College. While an individual cannot and should not attempt objectively to represent the views of the student body at large, the member should attempt to engage the student community on every issue. Members will fully participate in College Governance toward the same end.

Article 13. Community Representation

Community Representatives will be elected by and for particular constituencies within the student body.

Article 14. Elections, Appointments & Recall

All elected members of student government will be nominated within the Assembly of Students. Positions of special interest will be elected through a ballot. All elected members of Student Government may be recalled by the Assembly of Students. Special elections will be held for Officer and Committee positions if vacated and in the case of recall.

Article 15. Budgeting

The Student Government will budget the Student Activities Fees. At the end of the Spring semester, the Assembly of Students will construct the following year’s annual budget, allocating funds to student organizations, the Society of Friends and Lovers, the Summit for an Egalitarian Society, Student Activities Committee and the Office of Student Government. Funding will be allocated according to the priorities and values of the student body, considering the ways in which funds have been best used to enrich the community in the past.

Article 16. Amending the Constitution

The community’s relationship to Student Government will necessarily change over time. As such, a continual reexamination of the Constitution of Pitzer College Student Government will allow for the continued health and relevance of the Student Government. All amendments to the Constitution will be discussed and voted on by the Assembly of Students; amendments will also be put to a student-wide vote.

__________________

The Student Government of Pitzer College recognizes several manifestations of the essence of the Pitzer College student body. These symbols carry the full weight and respect of our collective adoration.

The Constitution of Pitzer College Student Government

Article 1. Statement of Relationship of Pitzer College Student Government to Pitzer College Governance and to the Community

1.1 The students of Pitzer College recognize the Pitzer College Student Government as the official body responsible to construct full and meaningful student participation in all college governance decisions; to actively ensure that these college governance decisions are open, democratic, and transparent; to advocate for the full implementation and protection of the Bill of Student Rights and the rights and interests of the student as a full and autonomous member of the College community; to facilitate and create discourse on college governance and pressing community issues; to provide services to students; and to fund, support and create student organizations and initiatives.

Article 2. Bill of Student Rights

2.1 The Bill of Student Rights will be written and established at the first meeting of the Assembly of Students.

2.2 Additional amendments to the Bill of Student Rights will be established in the same manner as other constitutional amendments.

2.3 Upon approval of the Bill, this Article will be summarily replaced with the Bill of Student Rights.

__________________

Structures of Student Government

Article 3. The Office of Student Government

3.1 From the Void sprang the Office of Student Government.

3.2 The Office of Student Government shall be the administrative and coordinative body within the Student Government.

3.3 Five Officers of Student Government will serve: Convener, Provost, Archivist, Web-Mage, and Councilor of the Exchequer.

3.4 The duties of the Office of Student Government shall be:

a) To coordinate the structures of Student Government.

b) To ensure the integration of the Student Government into College Governance.

c) To maintain the membership, history, records and website of Student Government.

d) To coordinate and facilitate the elections and appointments of student representation in College Governance.

e) To report to the Assembly regarding the Officers' activities, the specifics and significance of their actions.

f) To hold weekly office hours for the student body.

g) To appoint eligible students to College Ad Hoc Committees.

h) To administer, to to all of these ends, the Administrative Fund moneys (See Article X, Budget).

3.5 The duties of each Officer of Student Government are as follows:

a) Convener (President): To coordinate communication between the various bodies of Student and College Government, to serve as the Student Government liaison to the College Council agenda planning meeting (Bylaws Article 2, Section 2.5) and other bodies of College Governance, to meet weekly with the President of the College (in conjunction with the Provost), to actively pursue the implementation of all Student Government decisions, to attend the Assembly of Students, to be attendant at Student Government meetings.

b) Provost (President): To serve on the Budgetary Implementation Committee and the Trustee Budget Committee, advocating for budgetary decisions which are in accordance with Pitzer's Core Values of Social Responsibility, Community, and Action, and which meet the needs of the student body; to advocate for the interests and decisions of the student body; to meet weekly with the President of the College (in conjunction with the Convener); to defend the rights of the Pitzer student, as defined in the Bill of Student Rights, the Faculty Handbook, and the Student Handbook; to advocate for the continued equal and directive participation of the student body in all decisions of the College, to be attendant at every Student Government meeting.

c) Archivist (Secretary): To actively update and maintain the Archives of Student Government; and to ensure, in conjunction with the Web-Mage, that the Archives will be hosted in full on the Student Government website.

d) Web-Mage (Communications Director): To maintain and update the Student Government website; to announce in a 'College Committee Digest' email each weekend the meeting times and locations of all College Committees for the following week; to announce, via e-mail, at least two days prior to the meeting of the Council for the Co-Construction of Knowledge, the Society of Friends and Lovers, and the Summit for an Egalitarian Society, Town Hall meeting, Assembly of Students, College Council, and special College Governance meeting.

e) Councilor of the Exchequer (Treasurer): To coordinate the Student Government moneys, budgetary processes and budgetary by-laws. To process budgetary documents and compile information on the state of the budget.

3.6 The Office of Student Government shall have a dedicated office space, where the Officers of Student Government will hold their office hours and where the Archives of Student Government will be stored.

3.7 The Officers will meet at least weekly in order to effectively carry out their duties.

3.8 The Archives of Student Government will be managed by the Archivist, and each year will be continuously updated with: College Committee minutes, by-laws, reports etc.; College Council minutes, agenda, supporting documents; Strategic Planning documents; Master Plan and Residential Planning documents; Faculty Handbook; Student Handbook; the annual Budget of the College; the annual Budget of the Student Government; minutes from all Student Government Councils; minutes from every Pitzer student club and organization; documentation of every Student Government Forum; and a running list of every decision made by every College Governance body, with summary.

3.9 The Purse-Strings shall be the guiding and coordinating body for facilitating student access to the Student Government monies.

a) Twelve members will serve on the Purse-Strings: the Councilor of the Exchequer; the Class, New Resources, Transfer, International and Off Campus Representatives; and all Hall Council Delegates.

b) The Purse-Strings shall collaboratively craft and guide all funding proposals submitted to the body. The members of the Purse-Strings shall make constructive recommendations to the funidng seeker for the improvement of the request and direct the seeker to the appropriate bodies from which to seek money.

c) All funding proposals directed towards the Assembly of Students or Society of Friends and Lovers must first be reviewed by the Purse-Strings.

d) The Purse-Strings shall hold accessible office hours in the office of the Student Government during which time the Purse-Strings shall meet with all seekers.

e) The processes and policies of the Purse-Strings shall be set out and determined by the Budgetary Bylaws.

Article 4. The Assembly of Students

4.1 Once a month, students will assemble at large, in order to discuss and address issues of the community and to steer the Student Government. The Assembly of Students will serve as the highest authority within Student Government. The Assembly of Students will reserve the right to recall any person elected by that body throughout the year as detailed in the Process of Assembly.

4.2 Stewards: The Stewards of the Assembly will be charged with the health and continuation of the Assembly of Students, each with the responsibility of encouraging the greatest possible participation of the student body. The Stewards will consist of: two facilitators, two Historians, one Legislator, and one Town-Crier.

4.3 The duties of each Steward are as follows:

a) Facilitators: To run the Assembly according to the Process of Assembly; to facilitate a democratic and consensus-oriented process of community dialogue and decision-making; and to publicize the Assembly widely and thoroughly at least a week in advance of its meeting.

b) Historians: Each to record a complete narrative of the Assembly meeting, summarizing and attributing points articulated, capturing the flow of the meeting, noting decisions made, and controversies and to give these narratives to the Web-Mage.

c) Legislator: To act in the Assembly as the authority on the Process of Assembly, and Student and College Governance; to solicit proposals for the Agenda via email; to assemble the Agenda of the Assembly prior to its meeting; and to record the official decisions of the assembly.

d) Town-Crier: To loudly announce the coming of the Assembly while ringing the Bell of Assembly through all campus residence halls and common space in the hour before the Assembly meeting; to creatively and prominently announce the coming of the Assembly in the days prior to its meeting.

4.4 College Council: Every decision of the Assembly which concerns the community as a whole, or which is dependent on the cooperation of the Administration of the College, will by default be placed on the upcoming College Council agenda by the Student Government Convener. The Convener of the Student Government will relay these agenda items to the College Council Planning Committee.

4.5 Proposals: A proposal will be considered by the Assembly only once the proponent has discussed the issue with enough students to gather six signatures of support. The proponent will then bring the proposal to the relevant Student Government Council for discussion, advice and support. The proponent will submit the proposal to the Legislator of the Assembly at least two days prior to the Assembly. At least two email notifications will be sent, by the proponent, to the student body about the proposal prior to the Assembly.

4.6 Student Assembly Report: The Student Government Archivist will collate a document, the Student Assembly Report, which will contain: a report from the student members of each College Committee (Standing and Ad Hoc), a report from each Officer of Student Government, a report from each Hall Council, a report from each Council of Student Government, the proposed Agenda of the Assembly, the text of the proposals to be considered, and any relevant documents. Before the Assembly the Student Assembly Report will be sent to the student body. At the beginning of the Assembly, the Student Assembly Report will be distributed in paper format. At any time during the Assembly, an oral presentation of any of the reports in the Assembly Report can be requested.

4.7 Club Charters: The Assembly will consider for approval the charters of Pitzer clubs seeking official recognition.

4.8 Voting: Every Pitzer College student has a vote on the Assembly. The voting will take place as outlined in the Process of the Assembly.

Article 5. Society of Friends and Lovers (Student Life Council)

5.1 The Society of Friends and Lovers is charged with protecting, facilitating and invigorating the life of the student community.

5.2 The Society will meet at least weekly.

a) The weekly meeting will provide a space in which students can report on and coordinate the activities, project, and agenda of their respective groups, committees, and organizations.

5.3 The composition of the Society is as follows:

a) The following committees and organizations each have one voting student member; and, listed officers each receive one vote in the Society: members of Campus Life Committee, Aesthetics Committee, Social Chair, each Class Representative, New Resources Representative, Transfer Representative, Off-Campus Representative, International Representative.

b) All students are invited and encouraged to attend as full participants, but non-voting members in the Society. All students are invited and encouraged to attend as non-voting members but as full participants in the Society.

c) Non-student members of the Pitzer community may attend as non-voting members whose participation is contigent upon the will of the student members of the Society.

d) The Society shall have the option, to be decided by majority vote, to hold a 'special meeting' in which only students or only Pitzer students may attend.

5.4 The student members will elect the officers of the Society.

a) One student member will be elected by the other members to act as facilitator and convener of each meeting of the Society. This student will ensure that meetings of the Society are open, accessible, and well-publicized to the student body. As convener and facilitator this student will ensure the meeting of the Society and the faithful attendance of all members to its mission.

b) One student member will be elected by the other members to act as secretary at each meeting of the Society. The secretary will render complete minutes of the Society to the Archivist of the Offices of Student Government.

c) One student member of the Society will be elected by the other members to act as the Five College Social Chair.

5.5 The Society will administer the monies of the discretionary fund of Student Government.
a) Five College funding is to be administered solely through Student Activities Committee (Art. 8).
5.6 The Bylaws of the Society of Friends and Lovers: The Society will establish its own bylaws. The bylaws of the Society of Friends and Lovers will concern but not be limited to: elections, quorum, establishment of regular meeting time and place, special meetings, membership, eligibility of membership, responsibilities, powers and duties of membership, attendance, recall for removal in the Assembly of Students, budgetary bylaws, voting and rules of order.

Article 6. Council for the Co-Construction of Knowledge (Academic Affairs Council)

6.1 The Council for the Co-Construction of Knowledge is charged with coordinating a student agenda on academic issues, and advocating for student interests in the academy.

6.2 The Council will meet at least fortnightly.

6.3 The composition of the Council is as follows:

a) Student members on the following committees are full-time voting members whose attendance is necessary for the proper functioning of the Council: Diversity, Academic Planning Committee, Appointments, Promotions, and Tenure, Faculty Executive Committee, Academic Standards Committee, Trustee Investment Representative, Teaching and Learning Committee, Curriculum Committee, and External Studies Committee.

b) All students are invited and encouraged to attend as full participants, but non-voting members in the Council.

c) Non-student members of the Pitzer community may attend as non-voting members whose participation is contigent upon the will of the student members of the Council.

d) The Council shall have the option, to be decided by majority vote, to hold a 'special meeting' in which only students or only Pitzer students may attend.

6.4 The student members will elect the officers of the Council.

a) One student member will be elected by the other members to act as facilitator and convener of each meeting of the Council. This student will ensure that meetings of the Council are open, accessible, and well-publicized to the student body. As convener and facilitator this student will ensure the meeting of the Council and the faithful attendance of all members to its mission.

b) One student member will be elected by the other members to act as secretary at each meeting of the Council. The secretary will render complete minutes of the Council to the Archivist of the Offices of Student Government.

6.5 The Bylaws of the Council for the Co-Construction of Knowledge: The Council will establish its own bylaws. The bylaws of the Council will concern but not be limited to: elections, quorum, establishment of regular meeting time and place, special meetings, membership, eligibility of membership, responsibilities powers and duties of membership, attendance, recall for removal in the Assembly of Students, budgetary bylaws, and rules of order.

Article 7. Summit for an Egalitarian Society

7.1 The Summit for an Egalitarian Society will be an autonomous body with a large degree of self-determination.

7.2 The Summit for an Egalitarian Society will consist of representation from political and activist oriented organizations on campus.

7.3 The Summit for an Egalitarian Society will meet at least monthly.

7.4 The budget of the Summit will be utilized solely for collaborative efforts between member organizations.

7.5 The Summit will elect a Convener and a Secretary at the beginning of each semester.

7.6 The Summit will work together to organize a conference, at least annually, on a specific topic of social, political, economic, or environmental justice and activism. This conference will aim to address the topic from a multitude of perspectives.

7.7 Eligibility will be determined as follows:

a.) Any Pitzer or Five College organization may bring an application for admission to the Summit.

b.) All applications for admission will be considered and voted on by the Summit.

c.) Active Pitzer clubs will have continuous membership into the next year.

d.) Five College clubs with a plurality of Pitzer student members will have continuous membership into the next year.

e.) Five College clubs without a plurality of Pitzer student members must reapply for membership at the beginning of each school year, with the criterion that these organizations share in the values of the Summit’s mission, that these organizations have an active presence within the Pitzer community and that the Pitzer community has an active presence within the organization.

7.8 Each member organization has one vote.

7.9 All students are welcome to attend Summit meetings as non-voting participants.

7.10 Non-student persons are welcome to attend Summit meetings with the permission of the Summit.

7.11 The Bylaws of the Summit for an Egalitarian Society: The Summit will establish its own bylaws. The bylaws of the Summit will concern but not be limited to: elections, quorum, establishment of regular meeting time and place, special meetings, membership, eligibility of membership, responsibilities powers and duties of membership, attendance, recall for removal in the Assembly of Students, budgetary bylaws, voting and rules of order.

Article 8. Student Activities Committe

8.1 The Student Activities Committee will administer funds to Five College social events and campus social events and will foster and encourage student art, music, performance, expression, and enjoyment.

8.2 The membership of the Student Activities Committee is as follows: Class Representatives, Student Activities Committee Chair, Five College Social Chair, Student Activities Committee Representative, and any student who attends two meetings of Student Activities Committee.

8.3 The Student Activities Committee will establish its own bylaws. The bylaws of the Committee will concern but not be limited to: elections, quorum, establishment of regular meeting time and place, special meetings, membership, eligibility of membership, responsibilities powers and duties of membership, attendance, recall for removal by the Assembly of Students, budgetary bylaws and rules of order.

Article 9. Hall Councils

9.1 Hall Councils serve to maintain, build and enliven the life of the residence halls and to discuss Residence Life policy and to oversee its implementation.

9.2 The Hall Councils administer their budgeted funds to this end.

9.3 The Hall Council is responsible to facilitate and advocate for artistic engagement with the built environment (e.g. painting, sculpture, installations, etc.). To this end, the Hall Council will write and maintain its own policies and procedures for art, interior and exterior, and display these prominently in the community (See the Outdoor Art Policy).

9.4 The Hall Council will oversee and maintain the common areas of the residence hall (e.g. kitchen, living rooms, rooftop patios, courtyards, etc).

9.5 The Hall Council will write and maintain a constitution which will govern its operations, and which will be published each semester.

9.6 Membership: All student residents of a residence hall, excepting Resident Assistants, are voting members of the Hall Council.

Article 10. Student Organizations

10.1 Student organized and managed groups may come to the Assembly of Students to present their charter and intention, and gain the approval of the Student Government as a recognized student organization.

10.2 Recognized student organizations may seek one-time funding through all available Student Government funding sources and annual funding within the budget of Student Government.

10.3 Recognized organizations will hold open, democratic meetings, and will send meeting minutes to the Archivist.

10.4 Student Cooperatives: Student Cooperatives are vital to the life of the community and the health of the College. A Student Cooperative is a democratic, student-run enterprise, providing a function or service which addresses a need of the community. The Student Government shall be committed to advocating for and supporting the creation of student-run cooperatives. The Assembly of Students will hear proposals for new student cooperatives, offering comment, support, advocacy, and initial funding.

10.4 Student organizations have certain entitlements.

a) Student organizations have access to assistance from the Office of Student Affairs and the Office of Public Relations.

b) Student organizations have official and public association with Pitzer College.

Article 11. College Governance

11.1 College Council Meeting: College Council is the deliberative governance body of the college community.

a) Students will constitute no less than one third of the votes in a College Council meeting.

b) The Convener of the Student Government will relay to the College Council Agenda Planning Meeting every decision of Student Government which concerns the community as a whole, or which is dependent on the cooperation of the Administration of the College.

c) The Society of Friends and Lovers, the Council for the Co-Construction of Knowledge, and the Council for Social Justice may also independently resolve to place an item on the College Council agenda.

11.2 Standing Committees of College Council and Other College Standing Committees:

a) The student members of standing College Council committees are elected by the Assembly.

11.3 Ad Hoc Committees: The student members of Ad Hoc Committees of College Council will be nominated by the Officers of Student Government and approved by a majority vote of either the Society of Friends and Lovers or The Council for the Co-Construction of Knowledge according to relevance.

11.4 Trustee Committees:

a) The Convener will sit on the Trustee Student Life Committee and the Trustee Education Committee.

b) The Provost will sit on the Trustee Budget Committee and the Trustee Audit Committee.

c) A student will serve as representative to the Trustee Investment Committee.

11.5 Judicial Council representatives will be nominated in the Assembly of Students and elected by the entire student body as defined by the Election Bylaws.

__________________

Operations of Student Government

Article 12. Membership and Its Responsibilities

12.1 No student may serve on more than one College Standing Committee at a time.

12.2 Students may serve on College Ad Hoc and College Standing Committees simultaneously.

12.3 Students may serve in multiple Student and College Government positions, unless specifically prohibited.

12.4 The Officers of Student Government may not simultaneously serve as Stewards of the Assembly of Students.

12.5 The Convener, Provost, and Councilor of the Exchequer may not be elected or appointed to any other position in Student Government.

Article 13. Community Representation

13.1 Community Representatives will be nominated in the Assembly of Students and elected as defined by the Election Bylaws.

13.2 The Community Representatives shall be: Transfer Representative, International Representative, Environmental Representative, New Resources Representative, First Year Representative, Sophomore Representative, Junior Representative and Senior Representative.

13.3 The Community Representatives will be voting members of the Society of Friends and Lovers.

Article 14. Elections, Appointments & Recall

14.1 Student members of standing Committees of College Council will be nominated and elected in the Elections Assembly. One third of the body may vote to send the election of a particular committee representative position to a campus-wide election.

14.2 Student Government Officers will be nominated in the Assembly and elected in campus-wide election.

14.3 Student members of ad hoc Committees of College Council will be nominated by the Officers of Student Government, and these nominations will be sent for a vote of confirmation in the relevant Council.

14.4 Facilitators and secretaries of the Council, Society, and Summit will be chosen internally.

14.5 Recall: Any person elected by the Assembly may be recalled and replaced by the Assembly. The replacement will be made in an election in the Assembly, except in the case of the Officers, who must be replaced by Assembly nomination and campus-wide election.

14.6 Recall due to lack of attendance: The Chairs of College Council Standing Committees shall notify the Legislator and the Office of Student Government of significant lack of attendance by a student representative. The Legislator will place an item of recall and replacement on the agenda of the Assembly of Students, and will publicize the need for replacement. The recalled representative may address the Assembly in his or her own defense, and may run in the election to fill the position thus vacated.

14.7 Election Assembly: The March and December Assemblies of Students will be split between regular business and a special Election Assembly. The March Election Assembly will nominate and elect students to fill all positions in Student Government for the coming year. The December Assembly will nominate and elect students to fill positions to be vacated by students not returning for Spring semester. Students will nominate candidates for representation to Standing Committees of College Council and the Officers of Student Government. Elections for the representation to Standing Committees of College Council will be held in the Election Assembly. Elections for the Officers will be held in campus-wide ballot. Both elections and nominations are governed by the Election Guidelines and the Process of Assembly.

Article 15. Budgeting

15.1 The Annual Budget of Student Government will be decided in a special budget assembly which will occur as one section of the April Assembly of Students. Budgeting will be conducted as described in the Process of Assembly.

15.2 Funding will be distributed according to the Budgetary Bylaws.

a) Funding will be allocated according to the priorities and values of the student body, considering past ways in which funds have best been used to enrich the community.

Article 16. Amending the Constitution

16.1 An amendment will be brought to two meetings of the Assembly of Students, first for a discussion and alteration, and again for discussion, alteration, and submission for a two thirds vote. A student-wide ballot must approve the amendment by simple majority.

Article 17. Symbols Embraced by the Student Government of Pitzer College

Zapata's Moustache as the Revolutionary Facial Hair of Pitzer College

The Mounds as the Erogenous Zone of Pitzer College

The Prickly Pear as the Fruit of the Student Body

The Chickens as the Alarmists of Pitzer College

The Bicycle as our Object of Desire

ConstitutionWatch: Accountability

#1: 1st Year Election is Unconstitutional.
#2: Student Senate Crossed the Line. - 13 Student Senators speak for all students of Pitzer College by approving a purely political statement.
#3: The failure of Treasurer Chris Wohlers to maintain and publicize budgetary bylaws.
#4: The failure to elect an Environmental Senator.

#5: Accountability:

From the Constitution:

Article III, Section 5. Attendance.
a. The Executive Board shall define and publicize the requirements for an excused absence at the first Student Senate meeting of every academic semester.
b. Any Student Senate member who accrues more than two unexcused absences per semester must immediately be replaced by a student appointed by the Executive Board unless a motion to preserve their membership is approved by a two thirds majority of Student Senate.  The senator in question may not vote on this motion.

The Executive Board never defined what counts as an "excused absence", during the first meeting or any other.  This is significant because now we have no standard for judging what excuses given for absences are legitimate, and which shouldn't be accepted.  (If the Executive Board had said during the first meeting (or any other) that "excused absences" will only be granted in the case of a personal or family emergency, that is a lot different than setting the standard at allowing excused absences for being stressed out or hungover.)

As a result, it leaves the door open for Senators to NEVER show up to a Senate meeting.  This is exacerbated by the fact that Executive Board Secretary Buddy Bennett admitted at the last Senate meeting that he doesn't do a good job taking attendance.

I'm not even advocating that we take a "harsh stance" on absences.  I understand that sometimes going to Sunday night meetings is draining.  But, as a non-voting regular student, I want someone making sure my representatives SHOW UP or have a good reason why not.  It's a discussion we should have had a long time ago.

ConstitutionWatch: Environmental Senator

Since the start of the semester I've written a few times on the unconstitutional actions of the Senate Executive Board, and sometimes Senate itself, namely in the #1: first-year rep election, #2: the irrelevant, politically motivated IMF resolution, and #3: the failure of Treasurer Chris Wohlers to maintain and publicize budgetary bylaws.   As a result of Exec Board's recent refusal to approve the creation of an ad hoc committee on the Constitution, I took a closer look at the document in question:  There are even more violations of the Constitution than I originally thought.

I don't know why the Vanguard refuses to adhere to a document that was, I believe, approved by more people than elected any one of them.  Laziness?  Subterfuge?  Incompetence?  Disregard for the will of Pitzer students?  It's still unclear.

Violation #4:  No Environmental Senator.

Article I, Section 7 of the Constitution states:

The Environmental Senator shall be elected at the beginning of each academic year. The Environmental Senator is charged with representing the interests of environmental health and sustainability of the College, reporting on the environmental impact of the College, acting as a liaison between the EcoCenter and Student Senate, and participating in any College governance committees relating to sustainability.

Currently there is no Environmental Senator on Student Senate.  Aren't we concerned about sustainability?

Ad Hoc, Ergo Propter Hoc: The Vanguard Suppresses Progress

Yesterday's Student Senate meeting was marked by one of the strangest acts of inaction I've ever come across.  According to Senior Class Representative Megan Dooley '10: despite the direct requests of several senators, Senate Chair Brian Orser refused to create an ad hoc committee on the Senate Constitution.

(For those readers who are rusty on their Latin: ad hoc committees are created to address a specific problem or issue.  It's like a special task force.  In the context of Student Senate, officially recognized ad hoc committees have a specific purpose, regular and public meetings, and make regular reports to the Senate body on Sunday nights.)

Back to Sunday night:  I wasn't at the meeting personally, but according to several senators present, during New and Old Business, Megan requested that Brian approve an ad hoc committee to discuss Constitutional issues.  (Earlier that meeting, various aspects of the Constitution had been discussed.)  Brian refused, and apparently some of the other Executive Board members appeared visibly uncomfortable at the suggestion.  Brian explained that he wanted to wait until next meeting, when there would be more students present.  Megan asked him to approve it anyway, so they could get started in their discussion and have something to present in future meetings.  Again, Brian refused.

In my 3 years at Pitzer and 3 semesters of Senate experience, I have never before never encountered a refusal to create an ad hoc. Why would anybody refuse to recognize one?  As written in the current Constitution, it is the Chair's duty to create ad hocs:

Section 2. Powers and Duties.

The members of Executive Board shall have the following duties:

a. Chair
i.  To act as the official representative of the Pitzer Student Body.

...

vii.  To create ad hoc committees.

The Student Senate Constitution has a long proud history of student amendment:  As early as March 2008, I worked with, among others, Matt Kane '08, and Sean Sullivan '10, and Charles Butler '10 as part of the Constitutional Ad Hoc committee (remember that, guys?  Good times.)  We announced got together on Sundays at 5:30 in McConnell, we had some good discussions, proposed some amendments to the Senate body, and actually got them approved and implemented.

That is how lasting change is made.  You state your ideas upfront, you open it up to the community for adaptation and improvement, and if it's a good idea, it sticks.

Why is this Executive Board attempting to suppress community discussion?

I don't get it.

Tonight’s Senate Agenda

Tonight's Senate Agenda:

Magnolia Ave. Elementary mural at Pitzer funding request - Dean Pospisil
Tribal Nations, Indian Communities and Higher Education conference funding request - Maya Rosas
Direct Action Claremont new club funding request - Anthony Fuentes
Chiapas Support Committee club funding request - Claudia Lopez

As well as all funding requests tabled from last week
5C music festival
New Orleans Trip
Lily's Tacos

As always, see you at 6:30 pm in the Founder's Room up the stairs in McConnell.

Senate’s Back!

And it's got an agenda:

Grove House Birthday funding request - Jasper Kosokoff - 2nd week of discussion
Fil-Am funding request - Charles Butler - 2nd week of discussion

5C Music Fest funding request - Daniela Kronenberg
New Orleans Brigade funding request - Arthur Levine
Coyote Grace funding request - Jasper Kosokoff
After School Specials funding request
Lily's Taco Afternoon Soiree funding request - Sascha Roker
Moving Location of Senate Meeting - Jacqueline Legazcue

As always, see you at 6:30 pm in the Founder's Room up the stairs in the McConnell lobby.