A blog about the cool shit we do at Pitzer College.

234 posts.
152 comments.
332 tags.

Uncovered Vault

Creative Commons

Pitzer Uncovered blog by Amy Jasper is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.
Creative Commons License

Benson Auditorium Now Open!

Upcoming events:

Tuesday, March 23 – Annual Glass Humanities Lecture, 4:15 p.m.
Friday, March 26 – Without a Box performance
Saturday, March 27 – MCSI Concert: “Songs of Work and Resistance,” 8 p.m.
Wednesday, April 7- 9 – Native American Film Festival, 6:30 p.m.
Saturday, April 10 – “Fuel” film screening, 5:30 p.m.
Friday, April 16 – Contra Tiempo music performance sponsored by Campus Life and Chicano/a Studies, 7 p.m.

Workers for Justice Breaks Through to Local Media Outlets

"Pomona College students offer support to workers seeking to unionize" ran in the online version of  the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin late last night and was reposted in the Contra Costa Times:

On Tuesday, the workers petitioned the college's Senate in hopes of garnering support for a right to bargain collectively and without interference from the school's administration. Students also hosted a rally during Saturday's trustee meeting to draw attention to the workers' demands.
"They are a great support for us," said Benny Avina, catering chef at the college. "We've been struggling. They push you to that point. The unions are one of the last resources you have."
If you're a Claremont College student this article won't tell you anything new, but it's good to see that this story is finding a wider audience.

Tea Time Ain’t So Warm and Fuzzy. Bitch.

Pomona Workers Tell Their Stories

Workers for Justice Sees Groundswell of Support

The new "Workers for Justice" campaign seems to have sprung up overnight at the Claremont Colleges.  The kickoff event was on March 1, when 100-150 Claremont College students **and over half of the Pomona College dining hall staff** marched into the office of Pomona College President David Oxtoby to present him with signed letters and petitions in support of a fairer unionization process for Pomona College dining hall workers.

I asked Morgan Bennett '13 (featured prominently on the WfJ website) about his experience at Monday's rally:

Walking quietly into Pomona President Oxtoby’s office and turning in upwards of 150 signed petitions essentially demanding that the College sign an agreement for a fair unionization process for the workers without intimidation or interference was one of the proudest moments of my life. ... Seeing how all these incredibly passionate students from the five colleges have joined together to stand literally arm in arm with the Pomona dining hall employees, the subjects of this mind-blowingly inhumane mistreatment, reminded me why we need to continue to fight for equality anywhere and everywhere.

Recognizing the already sizable commitment to this campaign for the ethical treatment of the employees is inspiring but at the same time insufficient at the moment.  Working so hard and risking so much, the Pomona dining hall employees are desperately depending on heavy student support so that they might be able to speak freely of the mistreatment that they experience and the injustices they currently witness but are unable to report.

According to their website, WfJ recently performed a survey of 50 of Pomona College dining hall workers with the following results:

  • 89% of workers report having been impeded from taking their breaks.
  • 7 workers report having been discriminated against by management based on race, age, or sexual orientation.
  • 53% of workers report working “off the clock”.
  • 28% of workers report having problems with their work schedules and report having irregular hours.
  • 34% of workers report having difficulty in securing a promotion or raise. Many assert that there is no procedure for advancement.
  • 40% of workers report to have worked as many as seven days in a single week.
  • 82% of workers report having been injured on the job. Those injuries include: torn ACLs, cut fingers, burnt faces, alergic reactions, falling down stairs, broken hips, carpel tunnel syndrome, arthritis, and general pain in arms, legs, feet, hands, backs, and heads.
  • The 11 workers who did not report their injuries said they didn’t do so because they were either afraid of the repercussions or werediscouraged by management from reporting their injures.

According to Trevor Hunnicutt of The Student Life, Pomona is unlikely to concede:

[President] Oxtoby said a union would mar the progress the college has made in the last year in responding to workers’ concerns.

“The assumption, often, with a union is that everything that you have now you will keep and you will get more — you will have all of the channels of communication and ways of working with the college which we’ve developed over the years,” he said. “I think that’s not correct. I think it’s a little naive.”

... Oxtoby said he opposed the proposal in part because the yay-or-nay votes of individual employees would be public knowledge with “card check,” an assertion that union supporters and labor experts said was not necessarily true.

When asked if the college would agree to the employees’ request, Oxtoby said. “We’re still discussing it, but I do not expect that we will because we support the basic principle of secret-ballot voting processes.... The card-check process is not that type of process.”

He said he could not envision a way for the process to be “truly anonymous.”

From what I can tell, the student leadership is made up of mostly Pomona and Pitzer students, with wider participation spread out among the 5C's.  I've seen many students on several campuses wearing orange arm bands to show their support.   And the facebook group "Students in Solidarity with Workers for Justice", founded by Julie Juarez PO '12, boasts more than 400 members.

From the WfJ website, a well-written explanation of the what the card-check system (blogger's emphasis supplied):

A card-check is a unionization method that grants workers the power to bargain collectively when over 50% of workers sign union cards. Employers are asked to sign a card-check neutrality agreement in order to assure recognition of the results of the card check, and to guarantee that they will not intimidate workers or employ other union-busting techniques. Workers sign cards on their own time in the privacy of their homes and a neutral third-party agreed upon by both parties verifies whether or not a majority is reached. Without such a card-check neutrality agreement, Pomona would have no obligation to recognize a union, even if 100 percent of their employees submit their written support.

According to a student-talk email sent by Paul Waters-Smith '10, Anthony Chavez, grandson of seminal labor rights activist and United Farm Workers founder Cesar Chavez, will be speaking alongside Pomona dining hall workers on Saturday, March 6 at 2:30 pm in Marston Quad at Pomona College in support of the workers' demand for a fair unionization process for unionization.  Dolores Huerta may also join the rally later in the day.

90% of Pomona dining hall workers signed a petition calling on Pomona College to sign a non-intimidation/card-check neutrality agreement which they delivered to College President David Oxtoby's office Monday in a procession with well over 100 student supporters.

My own opinion?   I think it's clear that workers benefit from this additional avenue of unionization.  I signed the petition here.

*Apologies to my loyal readers for the tardiness of this post; I had a minor personal emergency and have been off campus since Thursday morning.  All better now.

**Addended 2 pm, March 7, 2010.

The Orange Peel Rises Again

I thought it was dead, but that was a fakeout! The Orange Peel is now online at http://pzorangepeel.com/wordpress/.

Graduation Speeches Due Tomorrow

Email them to Andrea Olsen by midnight tomorrow!

Embedded below are the past two student speeches, delivered by Springsong Cooper '09 and Ben Kramer '08.

CMC Student's Dispatch from Chile

Ben Casnocha CMC '11 was in the Providencia neighborhood of Santiago, Chile when the 8.8 earthquake struck.  Excerpts below, but you can read the whole post over at his blog.

At 3:34 AM I awoke to my entire apartment shaking violently. My bed creaked and I heard a vase of flowers in my kitchen fall over. I did not mentally process or consciously think of anything, not even "earthquake," but I had an instinct to walk over to my desk and grab my laptop. [I'm not what it says that my first thought was to protect my laptop, but there you go.] Propped up on a stand I feared it would fall over the desk and break, and indeed it was going to do so shortly had I not grabbed it. I stood clutching my laptop. A sliding French style door that separates my living room / desk area from bedroom moved and hit me, so I backed up and leaned against the wall for support. The shaking continued for a bit more time and then stopped and everything was silent and dark. The power had gone out in my building so all white noise and power lights: gone. I heard no screams or sounds or anything. Just total black silence.

...

In the late afternoon, I walked around my neighborhood a bit more. The sky was a gray haze from a supposed chemical fire that had started downtown. Nevertheless, I was amazed at the tranquility of Santiago. Public buses full of people passed by. Cars drove calmly. People chatting on the streets. I ate dinner at my favorite local restaurant and it was full of people. Much of the rubble and glass I had seen earlier had already been picked up. The scene was such a contrast from the images on TV. I know what I saw was a million times better than what the scene is like more north in Santiago, or especially in Concepción and along the coast. Still it's a reminder that it's hard to generalize about a situation in an entire country, let alone in one city.

Two for the Road

Way before this blog there were: Rainbow Destroyer and Shmul Howls.

Rainbow Destroyer and its embedded blog has been a crashpad for the music of a lot of Pitzer kids since August 2008.  It's home to a lot of the bands you should know: Let's Go Guantanamo, Fitness, Death by Panda, etc. etc.  Click through to all its parter sites/musicians/bands for some pretty cool stuff.  Below is a behind-the-scenes look at a Rainbow Destroyer music video, shot by Jeff Katz '10.

Next, Shmul Howls is the photography of Sam Monkarsh '10 aka SAMUEL WOLF MONKARSH, who makes the world look gritty and cool.

Below are some selections (I avoided ones with Pitzer faces, but if you click through to his blog you'll see people you know).

Senior Moments

Dear Pitzer Community,

It is my pleasure to share with you that Sol Estin ’10 has been named a Best Delegate at the 2010 Harvard National Model United Nations and Alex Friedlander Moore ’10 has been named to the Teach for America Corps.

Sol was named a Best Delegate for his representation of Costa Rica in the United Nations Economic Commission on Latin America and the Caribbean Committee. He is a political studies major and his advisor, Tom Ilgen, is also Pitzer’s Model United Nations team’s faculty advisor.

Alex is a psychology major whose advisor is Mita Banerjee. After training in the summer, Alex will be assigned to an elementary school in the Mississippi Delta in the fall. Teach for America assignments are awarded to outstanding recent college graduates who commit to teaching for two years in urban and rural public schools.

Please join me in congratulating Sol and Alex.

Sincerely,

Laura Skandera Trombley
President

Best of Talent Night 2

Bryce Coefield '11 and Skylar Boorman PO '10 pump up the Mraz:

Best of Talent Night

This is Katie Ferrara '10 at the recent "Talent Night" in the Grove House, with Kellen Wohl ’13 on piano, Sophie Beiers ’13 on violin, and Alycia Lang ’13 with accompanying vocals.  Thanks, commenter Brian!

Mimi Krumholz Wins Sophomore Seat

Although results haven't been released online yet, Mimi Krumholz '12 was seated in Senate last Sunday as the sophomore class representative. She beat out Hale Shaw in the online election two weeks ago.
"I hope to represent sophomores and reflect the quality of our class," says Krumholz. "But not the horrible smell."

Anybody Want to Take Notes on the Senate Meeting?

Although I'm loathe to miss another mariachi performance, I'm at home helping my parents with something. Somebody take notes/pictures/video and pass them along!

The Orange Peel Dries Up

www.pzorangepeel.com now points to this:

Who won?

11 days after ballots were counted and unofficial results for the constitution were released, there has been no mention of who won the race for sophomore class representative. What's going on here?

10–57 Freeway Interchange Closed All Week

From the LA Times at 9:51 am:

A hillside near the 10 Freeway and Highway 57 in Pomona collapsed Thursday, shutting down two interchanges as dirt and large rocks tumbled into traffic lanes, authorities said.

Boulders were reported sliding down the hillside about 8:30 a.m. near the westbound 10 Freeway transition to northbound Highway 57, and a light pole was lying in the road, said California Highway Patrol Officer Francisco Villalobos.

Part of Highway 71 to the northbound Highway 57 also was closed.

Caltrans crews were en route to the scene. Villalobos did not know when the roads would be reopened.

[Updated at 10:42 a.m.: CHP officials said the interchanges will remain closed for up to a week while crews work to repair the sinkhole and clean up the debris.]

Investigators were trying to determine what triggered the slide.

-- My-Thuan Tran

A Visual History of Tea Time

Harvey Mudd is Going Insane

Harvey Mudd is wasting no time in bringing on the next epic party-- the website for "Club Two300" is already online.   Mark your calendars for March 6.  Wow.

Screencaptures:

Why the Proposal is Bad

At this Sunday's Senate meeting, Senate Chair Brian Orser opened the discussion on the constitutional proposal that we're all talking about.  I was the only one to raise my hand.

I asked in plain terms:
What are the main objectives of the document?  Who wrote it?
In what specific ways is it superior to the operative Constitution?   What does it try to achieve?
(These were my honest questions.  Every time I have had a conversation about this document, with Senator Buddy Bennett, Senator Liz Lipschultz, with authors Jerzy Kaufman and Jasper Kosokoff, I end up with more questions than I began with.  I have NEVER heard a convincing argument for this constitution that made any sense to me.)
Senator Nick Tagliarino spoke up and "objected" to my questions on the grounds that they had already been answered during the first meeting in which it was proposed, back in November.
Official document author Lianna Schechter '10 said, essentially, that we had already discussed those things.
And with that, discussion ended.

So here we are, on the internet.  Here are my concerns.

Transition

The current Constitution is the result of 16 years of trial, error, and improvement.  It was just approved in April 2009 by a ballot vote of the entire student body.
The new system would require us to start from scratch:  There is no transition plan.  There is no "change.gov".

There has NEVER been public discussion on what would actually happen if this proposal is approved by the student body.

There is no set meeting time for the first meeting.  There are no student leaders to facilitate the first meeting.

If it were approved, there would be a bitter struggle for legitimacy: different groups of students could say "The first meeting will be on Tuesday morning at 10 am at the Grove House!"  "The first meeting will be on the Mounds on Friday afternoon!"

It will require people to create something out of nothingness, and the loudest voices will rule the day.

I think it is entirely possible that if this proposal were to be enacted, a first meeting might never even happen.  The document is just that messy and incomplete.

Governance

The current Constitution is written in good plain English. If the entire Pitzer College student body were abducted by aliens and suffered from mass amnesia, our Student Senate would still survive: the Constitution lays out in simple terms how everything works.  It is a simple and stable framework that specifies where to go, what to do, and how to function, while leaving very broad leeway for what we can actually accomplish.

This proposal is a mess. Its table of contents is fully half the length of the content itself.  It is incredibly difficult to understand, and gives no guidance on how any body will actually function.  It uses language like this:

We are not a collection of atomized individuals.  Rather, we are an ecological student community, exemplifying mutualism, deep inter-relationality, multiplicity and complementarity.  Recognizing this reality, that the development of one of us depends upon the development of all, we find it necessary to construct a space for the collective process of this communal development.

The question is HOW DO WE CONDUCT OURSELVES?  How can I get involved?  Where do I sign up?  Who can I talk to if I want to get something done?  Whose job is it to help me with this issue?  This document completely ignores these central questions.

Exclusion

There is a reality that proponents of the proposal (whoever they may be) are unwilling to face: There are students who can never, will never, and don't want to, come to Student Senate meetings.

This includes student athletes, pre-med students, students with full-time jobs, students taking 5 or 6 classes, New Resource students, off-campus students, Residence Assistants on duty, students with children, whose schedules simply don't allow it.

It may include you, a first-time reader of this blog, who doesn't give a shit about Student Government.  Maybe you never have and you never will, and you're annoyed that this keeps taking up your time and attention.  (It may be hard to believe, but I personally didn't attend a Senate meeting until my second year at Pitzer, and I lived a very full life before I did.)

Under the current system, there are representatives who are accountable to EVERYONE-- who work hard on behalf of the students who aren't there.

Under the new system, the people who show up and shout will get to cast their vote.  For the people who don't, can't, or won't show up, it's like they don't even exist.

Mob Rule

Contrary to its stated objective, this proposal would allow single students to become disproportionately influential.  Students that are very popular, very well-connected, very wealthy, very involved, very opinionated, very outspoken, will effectively rule the Assembly.

Take me, for example.  I'm a senior.  This is my 7th semester living at Pitzer College.  I've introduced speakers for Dining with Democracy in front of audiences of 200 people.  150 people read this blog yesterday.  I have a voice that is FAR louder than the average student.

I am not against this proposal because I'm afraid that my own voice will be drowned out.

I am concerned for the first-year students who will be thrown into a hot mess of a governance system.  I fear for the person who has a good idea but can't articulate it by yelling it out on the spot in front of a 150 people.

But when everybody shouts at once, nobody's voice is heard. And the quiet opinions will be silenced.

The current system of student governance protects minority opinions.  It takes 2/3 of students to end a discussion about something, which protects that one third from being silenced.  Under the new system, 51 people could vote to quiet the voices of 49 students who disagree with them, and win every time.

Vote NO.