A blog about the cool shit we do at Pitzer College.
234 posts.
152 comments.
332 tags.
|
From Nicole Scheunemann at 12:13 pm on September 25 [my emphasis supplied]:
Hey lovely ladies and gents,
After a very emotionally charged meeting yesterday, Reggae Fest just wanted to say that we love all of you and hope there isn't any resentful feelings. We want everyone to know that we didn't call or ask that meeting to take place and are sorry if there is confusion over the fact. Nor did we want to pry money out of the hands of everyone else when we put in a funding request form to senate. We were trying to go about things our normal way, and while we appreciate the senate leaders trying a new approach, we wanted you to know that we didn't design the meeting or want to appropriate funds. We are also sorry about the lack of foresight on the part of the leaders of this festival last year to ask for funding last spring that seemed to cause this whole shenanagan. We don't want to start a listserv war, we just wanted to clear the air a little!
we are thankful and grateful to all the clubs!
peace, love and irie vibes,
Reggae Fest
From Senate Treasurer Chris Wohlers at 10:44 pm on September 23 [my emphasis supplied]:
This is a reminder to clubs and students who have any interest in their money that the Pitzer Budget Summit will be tomorrow, Thursday, from 4-6 in the Gold Student Center Multipurpose Room. At this open meeting the community will democratically come to a decision on how best to provide funding for several organizations that received no funding during the last budgeting process.
Only those clubs that were allocated more than $1000 for the year will be considered for funding redistribution. In all likelihood, unless groups demonstrate a severe amount of over or underfunding their budget will be untouched. This is not a Viking raiding party. Although Viking helmets are strongly encouraged.
I am also still accepting comments on the budgets of specific clubs if you wish to have your opinion inserted into the summit. Suggestions for budget reallocations are welcome as they will both streamline the process and take away the potential pain of suggesting that your classmate receive less money.
Christopher Wohlers
Money
Below is Article V of the Constitution, entitled "Finance" [my emphasis supplied]:
ARTICLE V. FINANCE.
Section 1. Student Activities Fees.
The budget of Pitzer College Student Senate shall include the Student Activities Fees paid by enrolled students of Pitzer College.
Section 2. Funding.
a.Student Senate is responsible for funding all recognized student organizations.
b.Student Senate may fund appropriate College-based activities and events that enrich student life.
c.Student Senate is responsible for establishing and enforcing stipulations regarding the use of its funds.
d.Upon the Budgetary Committee’s recommendation, Student Senate may rescind funding from any student organization or event that has failed to demonstrate compliance with Student Senate’s funding directives.
Section 3. Budgetary Bylaws.
The Treasurer must maintain and publicize Budgetary Bylaws that specify the guidelines, requirements, and limitations for recognition, funding, allocation by Student Senate and student organizations. The Budgetary Bylaws may be amended by two thirds approval from Student Senate.
Section 4. Yearly Budget.
Student Senate must approve a pro forma budget for the following academic year no earlier than 6 weeks before the last day of the spring academic semester and no later than 3 weeks before the last day of the spring academic semester. The yearly budget must include substantive discussion during at least two Student Senate regular meetings.
From Senate Secretary Buddy Bennett at 11:10 pm on September 20 [my emphasis supplied]:
Resolution Establishing Student Senate Budget Summit
Whereas, several groups that are also integral to the Pitzer community were left out of the budgeting process during the Spring 2009 semester, and
Whereas, without regular funding these groups will need to obtain funding from other groups, and
Whereas, the Spring 2009 budgeting process was performed without participation by either the incoming Budgetary Sub-Committee, as required by the constitution, or by the greater Pitzer community, as required by democracy;
Therefore, the Student Senate shall hold open budgetary hearings so as to re-allocate Student Senate funds for the remainder of the 2009-10 academic year.
From Michael Hernandez-Henderson at 10:29 am on September 22 [my emphasis supplied]:
Dear pitzer Community,
I was also a part of the Budgetary Committee last year and attended the annual budgetary meeting as 1st year representative. As Megan previously stated, we did NOT overlook anything or make mistakes in distributing the money to the clubs on campus. The application to receive funding is an important step in receiving funding for the next year. We could not and cannot just decide on an amount to give a club that did not submit a proposal. We spent a good deal of our Saturday morning deliberating on the club budget and trying to make sure that everything was fair for the clubs that did sumit a proposal.
I also agree with Megan in saying that it is important for the community to know what really happened last year so that we can prevent the same problem from happening again.
Sincerely,
Michael Hernandez-Henderson
From Senior Class Representative Megan Dooley, 9:36 am on September 22 [my emphasis supplied]:
Dear Pitzer Community,
I was on the Budgetary Committee last year, which means that I was involved in the annual budgerary meeting that allocated funds to the clubs on campus. It is important to note that the budgetary committee did NOT overlook or make mistakes in regards to distributing money to the clubs on campus. Grill Masters,Empowered Women of Color and Reggae Festival did not submit budget requests, we most regrettably were unable to allocate funds to clubs that did request any funds. It is important to stress that clubs were not excluded. They did not apply which is a very important distinction to make.
We must look forward to think about ways that we can ensure that clubs who are counting on THOUSANDS of dollars request their money at the end of the school year during our yearly allocation of funds. It is extrememly unfortuate that we find ourselves in this position and I believe that the community as a whole would benefit from the existance of these clubs. It is crucial to stress that clubs this year need to make sure that there is a representative at the end of this year that is involved in the budgetary process so that we will not find ourselves in a position were clubs who want funds do not have them.
In regards to the annual budget allocation meeting, I was able to attend the meeting as the current Junior Class representative and the elected Senior Class representative. The other elected class representatives were invited to the meeting and were unable to attend due to scheduling conflicts. Chris Wohlers, who is this year's Tresaurer and therefore someone who could have attended the allocations meeting, was abroad meaning that he was unable to attend the meeting.
I believe that it is important that the community is aware of what actually happened last year so that we can move forward in such a way that will prevent this from happening again next year. In order to have a truly democratic process it is crucial that we have a properly informed community.
Cheers,
Megan Dooley
Senior Class Representative
From Student Senate Chair Brian Orser at 11:29 pm, September 21 [my emphasis supplied]:
Pitzer students:
Every year, Student Government funds all of Pitzer's clubs, organizations, Hall Councils, the Grove House, the Gold Student Center, and Pact, among others. These monies amount to two hundred and fourteen thousand dollars, and are drawn from the Student Activites Fees portion of your tuition. The students of Pitzer College find themselves in a remarkable and fortunate position, having secured almost complete control over the funding of student life and its improvement. It is because of the unique and progressive history of the College that we have the possibility of this financial self-government; however, this history alone is not a guarantee that these funds will be distributed in a communal, rational and successful way.
At the end of last year, the previous Budgetary Subcommittee of Student Senate budgeted out this year's money. Unfortunately, there were various oversights and mistakes made in the process of this budgeting, resulting in the exclusion of several clubs from the budget, and the distribution of what would have been their funding to other clubs and organizations. Among the clubs excluded were Grill Masters, the Empowered Women of Color, Tutors for a Cause and Pitzer Reggae Festival. Moreover, the Student Senate Budgetary By-Laws expressly stipulate that the incoming Budgetary Subcommittee decide the pro forma budget jointly with the incumbent Subcommittee; regrettably, this participation was prevented. This fact, in combination with mistakes made on behalf of the excluded student groups, made possible the current financial crisis.
Because the combined funding requests of these excluded groups are in the thousands, this occasion presents a crisis, both for the clubs and for the Student Government. To remedy the situation, the Student Government could fund the groups out of the Student Senate Discretionary Fund, which is the money we keep apart for the ongoing funding of student life throughout the year; this alone, however, would more than empty our coffers for the entire semester. Because the thousands of dollars which would have normally been allocated to Reggae Fest, Empowered Women of Color and Grill Masters have been distributed among the other clubs, the idea was brought forth of a small tax levied on all Senate-funded groups, to help recoup the misplaced funding. Though it would be an easy fix, this was rejected out of hand as indiscriminate and unsophisticated. It was suggested we open the opportunity for groups on campus to exercise their good will, voluntarily contributing funds to these affected groups, and hopefully returning them to their appropriate standing; as attractive as was this proposition, it was realized that this alone could not recoup the thousands of dollars needed, and that it would result in certain asymmetries. There is, of course, the unacceptable option of turning away these four student groups, leaving them with the project of recovering the misplaced funds from the various organizations and councils on campus which were the benefactors of this error. We are left with one decent way out of this mess, though it is the way out that will require the most cooperative, civil, communal, and thus difficult response to the problem. It was decided on Friday, at the Student Senate, that the Student Government must facilitate a community Budget Summit. These budgeting errors could have been corrected by the current Executive Board, or by Student Senate, in what would have been a much simpler and more conventional process. The Senate decided, however, that it is most important that the student body as a whole direct the redistribution of funds so as to achieve the fairest result.
The Summit will be held
4:00-6:00 PM Thursday, September 24th
Gold Student Center Multipurpose Room
Every Senate-funded entity on campus which received more than one thousand dollars (listed below) will send a representative, who will:
· present the group’s proposed itemized budget for this year, and
· explain in some detail these expected expenditures, and
· be prepared to answer specific questions regarding such expenditures
The community will then discuss each group’s budget and informally vote to determine appropriate funding. This process should return normalcy to the budget while increasing openness and transparency. Any group which desires to donate to these four impoverished student groups may also do so at this time. If later in the semester any student group should require further funding, the Student Senate will make every effort to provide for them. The results of the Summit will be approved by Senate thereafter.
It is regrettable that we should have to work to recover from last year’s errors, but I think we might find in this an opportunity for us to truly engage with the budgeting of our Student Activities Fees. Perhaps this coming together will also allow for a dialogue around our needs and priorities as a student body. Let us all practice patience, and seek camaraderie as we shuffle around a few thousand dollars of the two hundred grand we are given this year.
Please contact me with any questions, either by phone or via email.
With respect, and my apologies,
Brian Orser
Student Body President
Pitzer College c/o 2011
Social Ecology
831.818.5994
This Summit will not affect Hall Councils, nor the First-Year, Sophomore, Junior, Senior, Transfer, or NRS Class Funds.
Affected Groups:
- Art Collective
- Asian and Pacific American Coalition
- Black Student Union
- Dining with Democracy
- Ecology Center
- Feminist Coalition
- Garden
- Gold Student Center
- Grove House Committee
- Kohoutek
- Latino Student Union
- Music Coalition
- The Otherside
- Pitzer Outdoor Adventures
- Queer and Allies Club
- SAC
- Shakedown Café
- LOVE (for free)
- Green Bike Program
Below is a table with past and current Student Senate funding levels (at about 90% completeness and accuracy).
Click on the "2009-2010" column to see the best-funded organizations: PAct, Kohoutek, the Gold Student Center, and Dining with Democracy have a total of $76, 700, which is 38.65% of the entire Student Senate budget.
If you click on the "change" column you can see who the big winners are this year (I'm proud to say that Dining with Democracy was the recipient of the largest positive funding change this year-- and I wasn't even on campus to intimidate people this year!)
Comments on this would be awesome: what do you think gets too much money? Which org should get a ton MORE money?
Senate Student Organization Funding
[table id=5 /]
*edited to fix the Hall Council funding amounts - 3:54 pm
Also take note of the orgs that are now defunct (in Senate's eyes, at least):
- Cricket Club
- Grillmasters
- Masculinist Coalition
- The Orange Peel
- Pitzer Emergency Response Team
- Sculpting Club
- Students for Responsible Consumer Spending
The budgeting process is perhaps the most wide-reaching action of Student Senate. Every on- campus student pays the student activity fees which comprise the Senate budget.
There are 3 stages to student organization budgeting:
Ad Hoc: any student organization or cause may apply for funding at any point during the academic year.
Pro Forma: each late spring there are at least two budgeting meetings in which Senate allocates most of its budget for the following year.
5 College: each late spring the Senate Executive Board attends a 5 College budgeting meeting in which they decide how much of Pitzer’s funds to allocate to 5 College organizations.
Each stage of funding is different, and fraught with unique problems and circumstances on both sides. Funding request procedures, funding limits, and funding attitudes are markedly different for all three.
Often it seems that Student Senate, or other funding sources, give out money never to hear of it again. No regulation, oversight, or accountability, after the check is cashed. This blog is going to take a sharp look at who we give our money too, and what those allocations are spent on. Stay tuned.
|
|
Latest comments