Pitzer Uncovered:
A blog about the cool shit we do at Pitzer College.

205 posts.
141 comments.
271 tags.

Uncovered Vault

Creative Commons

Pitzer Uncovered blog by Amy Jasper is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.
Creative Commons License

Constitutional Proposal Fails

From Secretary Buddy Bennett:

Dear Students,

While the results of other elections will be forthcoming this week, I am able to report on the status of the constitutional change on the ballot:

The proposed constitution was defeated by a margin of 330 to 148. There were between 510 and 487 votes (depending on how duplicate votes and other abnormalities are counted) in the election, although not all who participated in the election voted on the constitutional change.

Especially as these are unofficial results, I will not hesitate to express a few personal sentiments. Many students at Pitzer expect more from their student government, and came to Pitzer with hopes that have yet to be met. We are by no means back to where we started in the process of attempting to bridge the gap between our expectations and reality. I am truly impressed by the amount of energy and time that students have put into attempting to create this reality; and, I am proud to think that Pitzer is one of the few institutions where students make manifest their commitment to the school by attempting to make it reflect their wants. I hope that the attached essay (Student Essay - The Political History of Pitzer College, 1988) is pleasurable reading for those who have already invested so much in trying to meet expectation with reality.

Happy Travels,

--
Buddy Bennett
Pitzer College c/o 2011
Student Government Secretary


--Thought up and written by

Harvey Mudd is Going Insane

Harvey Mudd is wasting no time in bringing on the next epic party-- the website for "Club Two300" is already online.   Mark your calendars for March 6.  Wow.

Screencaptures:


--Thought up and written by

Vote Here

http://www.pitzer.edu/student_life/voting/student_elections.asp

Why Our Current System is Better

The simple fact is this:

Most Pitzer students do not have the desire to get involved in Student Senate. Never have, never will.

We should not be afraid of this.  We should not get mad at them.  They are not bad people.  (I, for one, find many of them likable and fascinating.)

Most Pitzer students (maybe even you, reader!) want to:

make friends and learn cool stuff and go to parties and do community service and study abroad and go to the movies and do an independent study and have lunch for 2 hours and learn a foreign language and join a club or two and get a job.

While a lot of people like to get involved in student organizations, Hall Councils, PACT, and SAC, it is a rare person who wants to get involved in the nitty gritty of college governance.  (If you do want to get involved into Student Senate, email me!  I can help you figure out how to get involved.)

We need a system that accepts this fact and is ready for when that 95% comes calling.

If I have a good idea, I don't want to have to launch a popularity campaign in order corral the votes of 300 people.

I want to be able to present it for 5 minutes to the 45 kids that care most about college policy.

If I have a problem, I don't want to yell it to a "Facilitator" in front of 10 of my friends on the top of a Mound.

I want to be able to go to a website and see the name, picture, and email address of the person who can help me solve it.

Vote NO on the constitutional proposal.


--Thought up and written by

Why the Proposal is Bad

At this Sunday's Senate meeting, Senate Chair Brian Orser opened the discussion on the constitutional proposal that we're all talking about.  I was the only one to raise my hand.

I asked in plain terms:
What are the main objectives of the document?  Who wrote it?
In what specific ways is it superior to the operative Constitution?   What does it try to achieve?
(These were my honest questions.  Every time I have had a conversation about this document, with Senator Buddy Bennett, Senator Liz Lipschultz, with authors Jerzy Kaufman and Jasper Kosokoff, I end up with more questions than I began with.  I have NEVER heard a convincing argument for this constitution that made any sense to me.)
Senator Nick Tagliarino spoke up and "objected" to my questions on the grounds that they had already been answered during the first meeting in which it was proposed, back in November.
Official document author Lianna Schechter '10 said, essentially, that we had already discussed those things.
And with that, discussion ended.

So here we are, on the internet.  Here are my concerns.

Transition

The current Constitution is the result of 16 years of trial, error, and improvement.  It was just approved in April 2009 by a ballot vote of the entire student body.

The new system would require us to start from scratch:  There is no transition plan.  There is no "change.gov".

There has NEVER been public discussion on what would actually happen if this proposal is approved by the student body.

There is no set meeting time for the first meeting.  There are no student leaders to facilitate the first meeting.

If it were approved, there would be a bitter struggle for legitimacy: different groups of students could say "The first meeting will be on Tuesday morning at 10 am at the Grove House!"  "The first meeting will be on the Mounds on Friday afternoon!"

It will require people to create something out of nothingness, and the loudest voices will rule the day.

I think it is entirely possible that if this proposal were to be enacted, a first meeting might never even happen.  The document is just that messy and incomplete.

Governance

The current Constitution is written in good plain English. If the entire Pitzer College student body were abducted by aliens and suffered from mass amnesia, our Student Senate would still survive: the Constitution lays out in simple terms how everything works.  It is a simple and stable framework that specifies where to go, what to do, and how to function, while leaving very broad leeway for what we can actually accomplish.

This proposal is a mess. Its table of contents is fully half the length of the content itself.  It is incredibly difficult to understand, and gives no guidance on how any body will actually function.  It uses language like this:

We are not a collection of atomized individuals.  Rather, we are an ecological student community, exemplifying mutualism, deep inter-relationality, multiplicity and complementarity.  Recognizing this reality, that the development of one of us depends upon the development of all, we find it necessary to construct a space for the collective process of this communal development.

The question is HOW DO WE CONDUCT OURSELVES?  How can I get involved?  Where do I sign up?  Who can I talk to if I want to get something done?  Whose job is it to help me with this issue?  This document completely ignores these central questions.

Exclusion

There is a reality that proponents of the proposal (whoever they may be) are unwilling to face: There are students who can never, will never, and don't want to, come to Student Senate meetings.

This includes student athletes, pre-med students, students with full-time jobs, students taking 5 or 6 classes, New Resource students, off-campus students, Residence Assistants on duty, students with children, whose schedules simply don't allow it.

It may include you, a first-time reader of this blog, who doesn't give a shit about Student Government.  Maybe you never have and you never will, and you're annoyed that this keeps taking up your time and attention.  (It may be hard to believe, but I personally didn't attend a Senate meeting until my second year at Pitzer, and I lived a very full life before I did.)

Under the current system, there are representatives who are accountable to EVERYONE-- who work hard on behalf of the students who aren't there.

Under the new system, the people who show up and shout will get to cast their vote.  For the people who don't, can't, or won't show up, it's like they don't even exist.

Mob Rule

Contrary to its stated objective, this proposal would allow single students to become disproportionately influential.  Students that are very popular, very well-connected, very wealthy, very involved, very opinionated, very outspoken, will effectively rule the Assembly.

Take me, for example.  I'm a senior.  This is my 7th semester living at Pitzer College.  I've introduced speakers for Dining with Democracy in front of audiences of 200 people.  150 people read this blog yesterday.  I have a voice that is FAR louder than the average student.

I am not against this proposal because I'm afraid that my own voice will be drowned out.

I am concerned for the first-year students who will be thrown into a hot mess of a governance system.  I fear for the person who has a good idea but can't articulate it by yelling it out on the spot in front of a 150 people.

But when everybody shouts at once, nobody's voice is heard. And the quiet opinions will be silenced.

The current system of student governance protects minority opinions.  It takes 2/3 of students to end a discussion about something, which protects that one third from being silenced.  Under the new system, 51 people could vote to quiet the voices of 49 students who disagree with them, and win every time.

Vote NO.


--Thought up and written by

What Happened At Senate

200th post, and it's an important one.  Here's the timeline leading up to tonight.

  • 8 months ago, "the Vanguard" was elected to the Executive Board of Student Senate.
  • This Fall, they made 9 secret, illegal appointments to Senate positions.  By "secret" I mean that they were never announced to be senators during a meeting, not ratified via meeting minutes, and they were not listed anywhere public, except perhaps on a Senate attendance sheet.  By "illegal" I mean that the positions are constitutionally required to be filled by election.
  • In September Arthur Levine '13 was persuaded to run for First-year representative in order to vote "yes" on the constitutional proposal.  This election, which was botched and had to be redone, was the only election of the entire 2009-2010 school year.
  • Since the start of the school year, the Executive Board refused to elect senators to fill vacant seats and refused to hold elections for Judicial Council.
  • Since the start of the school year, the Executive Board willfully made a large number of Constitutional violations that would have promoted transparency, accountability, efficiency, environmental responsibility, and student participation.
  • On November 15, 2009, Senator Megan Dooley asked for approval of the creation of an ad hoc that would aim to fix constitutional issues and improve student government.  Chair Brian Orser refused its approval.
  • On November 22, 2009, a proposal was introduced for a new kind of governance system that would significantly decentralize power and create a once-a-month student assembly.  The meeting was well attended and a wide range of opinions on a new system were voiced.
  • For following two weeks, several "town hall meetings" were held under the guise of soliciting student input.  There was very little critical input on the proposal itself, and none of that "input" was ever incorporated into the document itself.
  • On December 2, 2009, Dean of Students Jim Marchant sent an email asking for Student Senate to get into compliance with its own Constitution by having elections to fill vacant senate positions and to legitimize the 9 positions that were illegally appointed.
  • On December 6, 2009, Chair Brian Orser began the Senate meeting by saying that Senate's legitimacy was called into question.  Later that meeting, an ad hoc committee was formed to address these issues, handpicked by Treasurer Christopher Wohlers.  Twice, other Senators were blocked from joining the committee.

Last night, Senate voted to "approve" the 9 students who were illegally appointed.  I strenuously objected, on the grounds that it would be completely unconstitutional, anti-democratic, and illegitimate to do so.  I also stated that it would set the precedent that the Executive Board can appoint students to elected positions whenever it wants to, with no recourse.  A member of the ad hoc committee, Nick Tagliarino '11, said that the approval of those students would be a one-time fix to an undesirable situation, and the committee wouldn't endorse it as setting a precedent.

The approval of those 9 students passed anyway, with those 9 students voting in that very decision.

Then discussion turned to the Constitutional proposal.  Senate Chair Brian Orser opened the discussion, and I was the only one to raise my hand.  I asked in the plainest terms: what are the main objectives of the document?  Why, specifically, is it superior to the operative Constitution?  Who wrote it?
Nick Tagliarino spoke up and "objected" to my questions on the grounds that they had been answered during the first meeting in which it was proposed, back in November.
Official document author Liana Schecter said, essentially, that we had already discussed those things.
And with that, discussion ended.

Brian Orser began to initiate the vote proceedings.  I spoke up and said it would be a good idea to calculate the number of affirmative votes needed before the vote started, to preempt a procedural conflict.  Because there are so many vacant positions, there are only 36 sitting senators, by the Chair's count.  Therefore Orser placed the number of affirmative votes needed at 25.  (36*.67=24.12 --> 25)

The Chair began the role call vote as Secretary Buddy Bennett kept a running tally of votes on the chalkboard.  When Jasper Kosokoff's name was called, an email that he had sent ahead of time was counted as an affirmative vote.  The same happened for Marie Claire Burt.  A few students objected to that on the basis that the 'email privilege' wasn't made available to everyone.  I spoke up and said that it was not pre-announced that the proposal would come to a vote tonight.  Eleanor Green immediately spoke up and read from a section Robert's Rules that stated that vote by mail was allowed.  Based on a liberal reading of Robert's Rules, those two votes-by-email were counted.

After the Chair finished the roll call, the tally stood at 24 to 7 (or 8, it's unclear to me).

Brian Orser then yielded his position as chair to Christopher Coughlin, who is the Trustee Investment Senator and does not have a vote.  Brian cast his vote in favor of the proposal to reach 25 affirmative votes.

That's how the Constitutional proposal passed.

Not through consensus building.   Not through persuasion.  Not through community organizing.

No elections.  No letter writing.  No petitions.   No protests.   No debates.   No hearings.

5 people got elected 8 months ago, and managed to destroy a student government from the inside in order to force through an unproven, untested document that nobody can explain well. It's an embarrassment.

The current group of people currently masquerading as Senators just destroyed the trust Pitzer College places in students to participate in College Governance.  And they proved nothing except this:  the idea they are pushing must be so bad that they had to cheat to "pass" the proposal.


--Thought up and written by

New Version of Constitutional Proposal!!!

The Constitution of Pitzer College Student Government

Preamble

While we recognize that in the life of the College, We the students of Pitzer College are but passing through, we assert that from the moment we arrive, this academy and its campus become our home, our community, and the foundation of our relationship with the world.  We, the student-people of Pitzer College, establish a new Student Government, founded upon the principles of direct democracy, the collective process of creation, freedom and autonomy, and the continuation of a dynamic student history which creatively joins Pitzer's past and future.  Because the decisions of the College will proceed with or without us, we must organize ourselves into a collective body in order to work alongside faculty and staff in actively creating and directing the future of the College and our community.
We are not a collection of atomized individuals.  Rather, we are an ecological student community, exemplifying mutualism, deep inter-relationality, multiplicity and complementarity.  Recognizing this reality, that the development of one of us depends upon the development of all, we find it necessary to construct a space for the collective process of this communal development.

Statement of Summary and Intention

Article 1.  Statement of Relationship of Pitzer Student Government to Pitzer College Governance and to Other Student Governments

The students of Pitzer College recognize the Pitzer College Student Government as the official body responsible for the formation, protection and implementation of the rights, decisions, and interests of the student body.  Pitzer College Student Government is the student aspect of Pitzer College Governance.  The Pitzer Student Government will collaborate with other student governments to advance the interests of the Pitzer College student body.

Article 2.  Bill of Student Rights

The Bill of Student Rights is an articulation of the rights of Pitzer College students as individuals and as a community, and of the rights of student organizations and Student Government.  The Student Government will protect and uphold these rights against any encroachments.
____________________
Structures of Government

Article 3.  The Office of Student Government

The Office of Student Government serves to coordinate, preserve and support Student Government, to support and unite student organizations, and to ensure and protect student participation in College Governance. The Officers will advocate for the rights, will, and decisions of the student body and Student Government, and will manage the Archives and Website of Student Government. The Officers will also support students and student groups in their interactions with the College Administration, and will facilitate the realization of students' demands.  The Officers will be five: the Convener, the Provost, the Archivist, the Web-Master, and the Financier.  As a sub-office, the Purse Strings is the primary resource for students seeking funding from institutional sources at Pitzer College.

Article 4.  The Assembly of Students

One student, one vote. Once a month, students will assemble at large, in order to discuss and address issues of the community and to steer the Student Government. The Assembly of Students will serve as the highest authority within Student Government and the heart of student action in College Governance. Relevant proposals which are approved by the Assembly will be placed on the College Council agenda. The Assembly of Students will choose two facilitators whose sole job is to ensure focus and fairness, and to draw out marginalized student voices. The Assembly of Students will reserve the right to recall and replace any elected student representation in Student Government.

Article 5. Pitzer Endowment for the Arts and Community Engagement

The  Pitzer Endowment for the Arts and Community Engagement serves to encourage and fund community initiatives and critical community engagement projects, and to foster art, music and creative free expression. The Pitzer Endowment for the Arts and Community Engagement will protect free expression and diverse community control of space on campus. The Pitzer Endowment for the Arts and Community Engagement will ensure that the policies and actions of the College support, encourage and allow for the free and full expression of a multiplicity of students.

Article 6. Academic Affairs Council

The Academic Affairs Council is charged with the development, articulation and coordination of a student agenda for the academy. The Council will be responsible for implementing this agenda through concerted cross-Committee action and for advocating for student interests in the academy.  This Council will discuss the ongoing considerations and decisions of College Governance and respond accordingly.

Article 7. Summit for Social Justice

The Summit for Social Justice  is a body which will facilitate collaboration between student groups engaged in a common struggle against interlocking systems of domination. The Summit recognizes that their respective social and political struggles are intimately intertwined and advocates for the active solidarity which emerges from this understanding.  The Summit will be a place for these organizations to recognize shared values and goals, take advantage of shared resources, collaborate, and acknowledge and discuss ideological consistencies and differences.  The Summit will engage in the construction of a statement of shared purpose, organize and collaborate in action, and empower and impassion each other.  The Summit will utilize funds for collaborative efforts between organizations.  The Summit will not necessarily be representative of the majority.

Article 8. Student Activities Committee

The Student Activities Committee is charged with the health and wealth of campus social life.  The Committee will fund both Five College and Pitzer social events.

Article 9. Hall Councils

The Hall Councils are the autonomous student governance bodies which aim to construct an ideal dorm life for the student residents. The Hall Council is a space in which the residents of a dormitory will govern residence life by protecting students' rights, administering dorm art policy, overseeing Residence Life policy and its implementation, and encouraging community through art, music and happenings. The Hall Council will work with staff of the college to ensure the health and saftey of their community.  The Hall Council will defend the freedom of the students to decide how they will conduct their lives and use the Residence Hall and their individual residences as their own homes.

Article 10. Student Organizations

Student organizations are recognized student groups which have coalesced around a particular statement of intention. These organizations will be responsible to fulfill the missions laid out in their charters and will participate variously in the Pitzer Endowment for the Arts and Community Engagement, the Academic Affairs Council, and the Summit for Social Justice .

Article 11. College Government

Pitzer College has a unique governance structure which integrates Students, Faculty, and Staff into a collective college governance process.  Pitzer Student Government is an autonomous body which fulfills the student aspect of College Governance.  The chief deliberative governance body of the college community is College Council.  Pitzer students are full and equal participants in College Council and College Committees.
__________________
Operations of Student Government

Article 12. Rules and Responsibilities of Membership

Members of the bodies of Student Government will advocate for the rights, needs and decisions of the student body, within and without the structures of College Governance and with the Administration of the College. While an individual cannot and should not attempt to objectively represent the views of the student body at large, the member should attempt to engage the student community on every issue.  Members will fully participate in College Governance toward the same end.

Article 13.  Community Representation

Community Representatives will be elected by and for particular constituencies within the student body.

Article 14.  Elections, Appointments & Recall

All elected members of student government will be nominated within the Assembly of Students.  Positions of special interest will be elected through a ballot.    All elected members of Student Government may be recalled by the Assembly of Students.  Special elections will be held for Officer and Committee positions if vacated and in the case of recall.

Article 15. Budgeting

The Student Government will budget the Student Activities Fees.  At the end of the Spring semester, the Assembly of Students will construct the following year’s annual budget, allocating funds to student organizations, the Pitzer Endowment for the Arts and Community Engagement, the Summit for Social Justice , Student Activities Committee and the Office of Student Government.  Funding will be allocated according to the priorities and values of the student body, considering the ways in which funds have been best used to enrich the community in the past.

Article 16. Amending the Constitution

The community’s relationship to Student Government will necessarily change over time.  As such, a continual reexamination of the Constitution of Pitzer College Student Government will allow for the continued health and relevance of the Student Government.  All amendments to the Constitution will be discussed and voted on by the Assembly of Students; amendments will also be put to a student-wide vote.

The Constitution of Pitzer College Student Government

Article 1.  Statement of Relationship of Pitzer College Student Government to Pitzer College Governance and to the Community

1.1 The students of Pitzer College recognize the Pitzer College Student Government as the official body responsible to construct full and meaningful student participation in all college governance decisions; to actively ensure that these college governance decisions are open, democratic, and transparent; to advocate for the full implementation and protection of the Bill of Student Rights and the rights and interests of the student as a full and autonomous member of the College community; to facilitate and create discourse on college governance and pressing community issues; to provide services to students; and to fund, support and create student organizations and initiatives.

Article 2.  Bill of Student Rights

2.1 The Bill of Student Rights will be written and established at the first meeting of the Assembly of Students.
2.2 Additional amendments to the Bill of Student Rights will be established in the same manner as other constitutional amendments.
2.3 Upon approval of the Bill, this Article will be replaced with the Bill of Student Rights.
__________________
Structures of Student Government

Article 3.  The Office of Student Government

3.1  From the Void sprang the Office of Student Government.
3.2 The Office of Student Government shall be the administrative and coordinative body within the Student Government.
3.3 Five Officers of Student Government will serve: Convener, Provost, Archivist, Web-Master, and Financier.
3.4 The duties of the Office of Student Government shall be:
a) To coordinate the structures of Student Government.
b) To ensure the integration of the Student Government into College Governance.
c) To maintain the membership, history, records and website of Student Government.
d) To coordinate and facilitate the elections and appointments of student representation in College Governance.
e) To report to the Assembly regarding the Officers' activities, the specifics and significance of their actions.
f) To hold weekly office hours for the student body.
g) To appoint eligible students to College Ad Hoc Committees.
h) To administer, to all of these ends, the Administrative Fund monies (See Article X, Budget).
3.5 The duties of each Officer of Student Government are as follows:
a) Convener (President): To coordinate communication between the various bodies of Student and College Government; to serve as the Student Government liaison to the College Council agenda planning meeting (Bylaws Article 2, Section 2.5) and other bodies of College Governance; to meet weekly with the President of the College (in conjunction with the Provost);, to actively pursue the implementation of all Student Government decisions; to attend the Assembly of Students; and to attend Student Government meetings.
b) Provost (President): To serve on the Budgetary Implementation Committee and the Trustee Budget Committee as an advocate in budgetary decisions which are in accordance with Pitzer's Core Values of Social Responsibility, Community, and Action, and which meet the needs of the student body; to advocate for the interests and decisions of the student body; to meet weekly with the President of the College (in conjunction with the Convener); to defend the rights of the Pitzer student, as defined in the Bill of Student Rights, the Faculty Handbook, and the Student Handbook; to advocate for the continued equal and directive participation of the student body in all decisions of the College; and to attend Student Government meetings.
c) Archivist (Secretary): To actively update and maintain the Archives of Student Government; and to ensure, in conjunction with the Web-Master, that the Archives will be hosted in full on the Student Government website.
d) Web-Master (Communications Director): To maintain and update the Student Government website; to announce in a 'College Committee Digest' email each weekend the meeting times and locations of all College Committees for the following week; to announce, via e-mail, at least two days prior, the meetings of the Academic Affairs Council, the Pitzer Endowment for the Arts and Community Engagement, Summit for Social Justice , Town Hall meetings, Assembly of Students, College Council, and special College Governance meetings.
e) Financier : To coordinate the Student Government monies, budgetary processes and Budgetary Bylaws; to process budgetary documents and compile information on the state of the budget.
3.6 The Office of Student Government shall have a dedicated office space, where the Officers of Student Government will hold their office hours and where the Archives of Student Government will be stored.
3.7 The Officers will meet at least weekly in order to effectively carry out their duties.
3.8 The Archives of Student Government will be managed by the Archivist, and each year will be continuously updated with: College Council Committee minutes, bylaws, reports, and supporting documents; College Council minutes, agenda, supporting documents; Strategic Planning documents; Master Plan and Residential Planning documents; Faculty Handbook; Student Handbook; the annual Budget of the College; the annual Budget of the Student Government; minutes from all Student Government Councils; minutes from every Pitzer student club and organization; documentation of every Student Government Forum; and a running list of every decision made by every College Governance body, with summary.
3.9 The Purse-Strings shall be the guiding and coordinating body for facilitating student access to the Student Government monies.
a) Six members will serve on the Purse-Strings: the Financier, the Class Representatives, and the New Resources Representative.
b) The Purse-Strings shall collaboratively guide any student seeking funds on campus. The members of the Purse-Strings shall make constructive recommendations to the funding seeker for the improvement of the request and direct the seeker to the appropriate bodies from which to seek money.
c) All funding proposals directed towards the Assembly of Students or Pitzer Endowment for the Arts and Community Engagement must be created in consulataion with the Purse-Strings.
d) The Purse-Strings shall hold accessible office hours in the office of the Student Government during which time the Purse-Strings shall meet with all seekers.
e) The processes and policies of the Purse-Strings shall be set out and determined by the Budgetary Bylaws.
3.10 Ambassadors of the Student Government of Pitzer College may be appointed by the Office of Student Government to serve at any school as liasons.
a) The Office has the right to appoint an ambassador from within the student body of Pitzer College to the student governments of the other members of the Claremont Consortium.
b) The role of the ambassadors will be to facilitate dialogue on issues of shared concern; to convey the messages, actions and requests of the Student Government; and to spread the spirit and values of the Pitzer College student body. All ambassadors will report to the Convenor and may be called to report to the Assembly upon the request of the Assembly.

Article 4.  The Assembly of Students

4.1 Once a month, students will assemble at large, in order to discuss and address issues of the community and to steer the Student Government. The Assembly of Students will serve as the highest authority within Student Government.  The Assembly of Students will reserve the right to recall any person elected by that body throughout the year as detailed in the Process of Assembly.
4.2  Stewards: The Stewards of the Assembly will be charged with the health and continuation of the Assembly of Students, each with the responsibility of encouraging the greatest possible participation of the student body. The Stewards will consist of: two Facilitators, two Historians, one Legislator, and one Town-Crier.
4.3 The duties of each Steward are as follows:
a) Facilitators: To run the Assembly according to the Process of Assembly; to facilitate a democratic and consensus-oriented process of community dialogue and decision-making; and to publicize the Assembly widely and thoroughly at least a week in advance of its meeting.  No more than one facilitator may be a man.
b) Historians: Each to record a complete narrative of the Assembly meeting, summarizing and attributing points articulated, capturing the flow of the meeting, noting decisions made and controversies, and to give these narratives to the Web-Master.
c) Legislator: To act in the Assembly as the authority on the Process of Assembly and on Student and College Governance; to solicit proposals for the Agenda via email; to assemble the Agenda of the Assembly prior to its meeting; and to record the official decisions of the assembly.
d) Town-Crier: To creatively and prominently announce the coming of the Assembly in the days prior to its meeting; to loudly announce the coming of the Assembly while ringing the Bell of Assembly through all campus residence halls and common space in the hour before the Assembly meeting;
4.4 A special Assembly of Students may be called by the Office of Student Government, the Stewards of the Assembly, or the Assembly of Students. A special Assembly may not be called less than 36 hours in advance.
4.5 College Council: Every decision of the Assembly which concerns the community as a whole, or which is dependent upon the cooperation of the Administration of the College, will be placed on the upcoming College Council agenda by the Student Government Convener. The Convener of the Student Government will relay these agenda items to the College Council Planning Committee.
4.6 Proposals: A proposal will be considered by the Assembly only once the proponent has discussed the issue with  enough students to gather six signatures of support. The proponent will then bring the proposal to the relevant Student Government Council for discussion, advice and support. The proponent will submit the proposal to the Legislator of the Assembly at least two days prior to the Assembly. Email notification will be sent, by the proponent, to the student body about the proposal prior to the Assembly.
4.7 Student Assembly Report: The Student Government Archivist will collate a document, the Student Assembly Report, which will contain: a report from the student members of each College Committee (Standing and Ad Hoc), a report from each Officer of Student Government, a report from each Hall Council, a report from each Council of Student Government, the proposed Agenda of the Assembly, the text of the proposals to be considered, and any relevant documents. Before the Assembly the Student Assembly Report will be sent to the student body. At the beginning of the Assembly, the Student Assembly Report will be available in paper format. At any time during the Assembly, an oral presentation of any of the reports in the Assembly Report can be requested.
4.8 Club Charters: The Assembly will consider for approval the charters of Pitzer clubs seeking official recognition.
4.9 Voting: Every Pitzer College student has a vote on the Assembly. The voting will take place as outlined in the Process of the Assembly.
4.10 The student governments of Claremont Graduate University, Claremont McKenna College, Harvey Mudd College, Pomona College and Scripps College may select a student of their respective schools to be a voting ambassador to the Assembly of Students.

Article 5. Pitzer Endowment for the Arts and Community Engagement

5.1  The Pitzer Endowment for the Arts and Community Engagement is charged with protecting, facilitating and invigorating the life of the student community.
5.2  The Pitzer Endowment for the Arts and Community Engagement will meet at least weekly.
a)  The weekly meeting will provide a space in which students can report on and coordinate the activities, project, and agenda of their respective groups, committees, and organizations.
5.3  The composition of the Pitzer Endowment for the Arts and Community Engagement is as follows:
a)  The following students are voting members of the Pitzer Endowment for the Arts and Community Engagement:  members of Campus Life Committee, all but one member of Campus Aesthetics Committee, one member of Diversity Committee, the 5 College Social Chair, the Student Activities Committee Representative, each Class Representative, the New Resources Representative, the Transfer Representative, the Off-Campus Representative and the International Representative.  The one member of Campus Aesthetics Committee who is not a voting member of the Pitzer Endowment for the Arts and Community Engagement will be a voting member of the Academic Affairs Council.  This member will be chosen from among the student members of the Campus Aesthetics Committee by the student members of the Campus Aesthetics Committee.
b)  All students are invited and encouraged to attend as full participants, but are non-voting members in the Pitzer Endowment for the Arts and Community Engagement.
c)  Non-students may attend as non-voting members whose participation is contigent upon the will of the student members of the Pitzer Endowment for the Arts and Community Engagement.
d) The Pitzer Endowment for the Arts and Community Engagement shall have the option, to be decided by majority vote, to hold a 'special meeting' in which only students or only Pitzer students may attend.
5.4  The student members will elect the officers of the Pitzer Endowment for the Arts and Community Engagement.
a)  One student member will be elected by the other members to act as facilitator and convener of each meeting of the Pitzer Endowment for the Arts and Community Engagement.  This student will ensure that meetings of the Pitzer Endowment for the Arts and Community Engagement are open, accessible, and well-publicized to the student body.  As convener and facilitator this student will ensure the meeting of the Pitzer Endowment for the Arts and Community Engagement and the faithful attendance of all members to its mission.
b)  One student member will be elected by the other members to act as secretary at each meeting of the Pitzer Endowment for the Arts and Community Engagement.  The secretary will render complete minutes of the Pitzer Endowment for the Arts and Community Engagement to the Archivist of the Offices of Student Government.
5.5  The Pitzer Endowment for the Arts and Community Engagement will administer the monies of the discretionary fund of Student Government. Five College funding is to be administered solely through Student Activities Committee (Art. 8).
5.6 The Pitzer Endowment for the Arts and Community Engagement will create a full voting representative member for each organization they have identified to be central to life of the community.
5.7  The Bylaws of the Pitzer Endowment for the Arts and Community Engagement:  The Pitzer Endowment for the Arts and Community Engagement will establish its own bylaws.  The bylaws of the Pitzer Endowment for the Arts and Community Engagement will concern but not be limited to: elections, quorum, establishment of regular meeting time and place, special meetings, membership, eligibility of membership, responsibilities, powers and duties of membership, attendance, recall for removal in the Assembly of Students, budgetary bylaws, voting and rules of order.

Article 6. Academic Affairs Council

6.1  The Academic Affairs Council is charged with coordinating a student agenda on academic issues, and advocating for student interests in the academy.
6.2  The Council will meet at least once every two weeks.
6.3  The composition of the Council is as follows:
a)  Student members on the following committees are full-time voting members whose attendance is necessary for the proper functioning of the Council:  Diversity, Academic Planning Committee, Appointments, Promotions, and Tenure, Faculty Executive Committee, Academic Standards Committee, Trustee Investment Representative, Teaching and Learning Committee, Curriculum Committee, and External Studies Committee.
b)  All students are invited and encouraged to attend as full participants, but non-voting members in the Council.
c)  Non-student members of the Pitzer community may attend as non-voting members whose participation is contigent upon the will of the student members of the Council.
d)  The Council shall have the option, to be decided by majority vote, to hold a 'special meeting' in which only students or only Pitzer students may attend.
6.4  The student members will elect the officers of the Council.
a)  One student member will be elected by the other members to act as facilitator and convener of each meeting of the Council.  This student will ensure that meetings of the Council are open, accessible, and well-publicized to the student body.  As convener and facilitator this student will ensure the meeting of the Council and the faithful attendance of all members to its mission.
b)  One student member will be elected by the other members to act as secretary at each meeting of the Council.  The secretary will render complete minutes of the Council to the Archivist of the Offices of Student Government.
6.5    The Bylaws of the Academic Affairs Council:  The Council will establish its own bylaws.  The bylaws of the Council will concern but not be limited to: elections, quorum, establishment of regular meeting time and place, special meetings, membership, eligibility of membership, responsibilities powers and duties of membership, attendance, recall for removal in the Assembly of Students, budgetary bylaws, and rules of order.

Article 7. Summit for Social Justice

7.1  The Summit for Social Justice  will be an autonomous body with a large degree of self-determination.
7.2  The Summit for Social Justice  will consist of representation from political and activist oriented organizations on campus.
7.3  The Summit for Social Justice  will meet at least monthly.
7.4  The budget of the Summit will be utilized solely for collaborative efforts between member organizations.
7.5  The Summit will elect a Convener and a Secretary at the beginning of each semester.
7.6  The Summit will work together to organize a conference, at least annually, on a specific topic of social, political, economic, or environmental justice and activism.  This conference will aim to address the topic from a multitude of perspectives.
7.7  Eligibility will be determined as follows:
a) Any Pitzer or Five College organization may bring an application for admission to the Summit.
b)  All applications for admission will be considered and voted on by the Summit.
c)  Active Pitzer clubs will have continuous membership into the next year.
d)  Five College clubs with a plurality of Pitzer student members will have continuous membership into the next year.
e)  Five College clubs without a plurality of Pitzer student members must reapply for membership at the beginning of each school year, with the criterion that these organizations share in the values of the Summit’s mission, that these organizations have an active presence within the Pitzer community and that the Pitzer community has an active presence within the organization.
7.8    Each member organization has one vote.
7.9    All students are welcome to attend Summit meetings as non-voting participants.
7.10  Non-student persons are welcome to attend Summit meetings with the permission    of the Summit.
7.11  The Bylaws of the Summit for Social Justice :  The Summit will establish   its own bylaws.  The bylaws of the Summit will concern but not be limited to: elections, quorum, establishment of regular meeting time and place, special meetings, membership, eligibility of membership, responsibilities powers and duties of membership, attendance, recall for removal in the Assembly of Students, budgetary bylaws, voting and rules of order.

Article 8. Student Activities Committe

8.1  The Student Activities Committee will administer funds to Five College social events and campus social events and will foster and encourage student art, music, performance, expression, and enjoyment.
8.2  The membership of the Student Activities Committee is as follows:  Class Representatives, Student Activities Committee Chair, Five College Social Chair, Student Activities Committee Representative, and any student who attends two meetings of Student Activities Committee.
8.3  The Student Activities Committee will establish its own bylaws.  The bylaws of the Committee will concern but not be limited to: elections, quorum, establishment of regular meeting time and place, special meetings, membership, eligibility of membership, responsibilities powers and duties of membership, attendance, recall for removal by the Assembly of Students, budgetary bylaws and rules of order.

Article 9. Hall Councils

9.1 Hall Councils serve to maintain, build and enliven the life of the residence halls and to discuss Residence Life policy and to oversee its implementation.
9.2 The Hall Councils administer their budgeted funds to this end.
9.3 The Hall Council is responsible to facilitate and advocate for artistic engagement with the built environment (e.g. painting, sculpture, installations, etc.). To this end, the Hall Council will write and maintain its own policies and procedures for art, interior and exterior, and display these prominently in the community (See the Pitzer College Outdoor Art Policy).
9.4 The Hall Council will oversee and maintain the common areas of the residence hall (e.g. kitchen, living rooms, rooftop patios, courtyards, etc).
9.5 The Hall Council will write and maintain a constitution which will govern its operations, and which will be published each semester.
9.6 Membership: All student residents of a residence hall are voting members of the Hall Council.

Article 10. Student Organizations

10.1 Student organized and managed groups may come to the Assembly of Students to present their charter and intention, and gain the approval of the Student Government as a recognized student organization.
10.2 Recognized student organizations may seek one-time funding through all available Student Government funding sources and annual funding within the budget of Student Government.
10.3 Recognized organizations will hold open, democratic meetings, and will send meeting minutes to the Archivist.
10.4 Student Cooperatives: Student Cooperatives are vital to the life of the community and the health of the College. A Student Cooperative is a democratic, student-run enterprise, providing a function or service which addresses a need of the community. The Student Government shall be committed to advocating for and supporting the creation of student-run cooperatives. The Assembly of Students will hear proposals for new student cooperatives, offering comment, support, advocacy, and initial funding.
10.4  Student organizations have certain entitlements.
a)  Student organizations have access to assistance from the Office of Student Affairs and the Office of Public Relations.
b)  Student organizations have official and public association with Pitzer College.

Article 11. College Governance

11.1 College Council Meeting: College Council is the deliberative governance body of the college community.
a) Students will constitute no less than one third of the votes in a College Council meeting.
b) The Convener of the Student Government will relay to the College Council Agenda Planning Meeting every decision of Student Government which concerns the community as a whole, or which is dependent on the cooperation of the Administration of the College.
c) The Pitzer Endowment for the Arts and Community Engagement, the Academic Affairs Council, and the Summit for an Egalatarian Society may also independently resolve to place an item on the College Council agenda.
11.2 Standing Committees of College Council and Other College Standing Committees:
a) The student members of standing College Council committees are elected by the Assembly.
11.3 Ad Hoc Committees: The student members of Ad Hoc Committees of College Council will be nominated by the Officers of Student Government and approved by a majority vote of either the Pitzer Endowment for the Arts and Community Engagement or the Academic Affairs Council according to relevance.
11.4 Trustee Committees:
a) The Convener will sit on the Trustee Student Life Committee and the Trustee Education Committee.
b) The Provost will sit on the Trustee Budget Committee and the Trustee Audit Committee.
c) A student will serve as representative to the Trustee Investment Committee.
11.5 Judicial Council representatives will be nominated in the Assembly of Students and elected by the entire student body as defined by the Election Bylaws.
__________________
Operations of Student Government

Article 12. Membership and Its Responsibilities

12.1 No student may serve on more than one College Standing Committee at a time.
12.2 Students may serve on College Ad Hoc and College Standing Committees simultaneously.
12.3 Students may serve in multiple Student and College Government positions, unless specifically prohibited.
12.4 The Officers of Student Government may not simultaneously serve as Stewards of the Assembly of Students.
12.5 The Convener, Provost, and Financier may not be elected or appointed to any other position in Student Government.
12.6  Any member of Student Government wishing to resign from their position must tender their resignation to the Assembly of Students for its acceptance.  The resignation will be an item on the agenda.  The Assembly must seek a replacement for the post immediately upon the acceptance of resignation.

Article 13.  Community Representation

13.1 Community Representatives will be nominated in the Assembly of Students and elected as defined by the Election Bylaws.
13.2 The Community Representatives shall be: Transfer Representative, International Representative, Environmental Representative, New Resources Representative, First Year Representative, Sophomore Representative, Junior Representative and Senior Representative.
13.3 The Community Representatives will be voting members of Pitzer Endowment for the Arts and Community Engagement.

Article 14. Elections, Appointments & Recall

14.1 Student members of standing Committees of College Council, the 5-C Social Chair will be nominated and elected in the Election Assembly. One third of the body may vote to send the election of a particular committee representative position to a campus-wide election.
14.2 Student members of ad hoc Committees of College Council will be nominated by the Officers of Student Government, and these nominations will be sent for a vote of confirmation in the relevant Council.
14.3 Facilitators and secretaries of the Council, Pitzer Endowment for the Arts and Community Engagement, and Summit will be chosen internally.
14.4 Recall: Any person elected by the Assembly may be recalled and replaced by the Assembly. The replacement will be made in an election in the Assembly, except in the case of the Officers, who must be replaced by Assembly nomination and campus-wide election.
14.5 Recall due to lack of attendance: The Chairs of College Council Standing Committees shall notify the Legislator and the Office of Student Government of significant lack of attendance by a student representative. The Legislator will place an item of recall and replacement on the agenda of the Assembly of Students, and will publicize the need for replacement. The recalled representative may address the Assembly in his or her own defense, and may run in the election to fill the position thus vacated.
14.6 Election Assembly: The March and December Assemblies of Students will be split between regular business and a special Election Assembly. The March Election Assembly will nominate and elect students to fill all positions in Student Government for the coming year. The December Assembly will nominate and elect students to fill positions to be vacated by students not returning for Spring semester. Students will nominate candidates for representation to Standing Committees of College Council and the Officers of Student Government. Elections for the representation to Standing Committees of College Council will be held in the Election Assembly. Elections for the Officers will be held in campus-wide ballot. Both elections and nominations are governed by the Election Guidelines and the Process of Assembly.

Article 15. Budgeting

15.1 The Annual Budget of Student Government will be decided in a special budget assembly which will occur as one section of the April Assembly of Students.  Budgeting will be conducted as described in the Process of Assembly.
15.2 Funding will be distributed according to the Budgetary Bylaws.
a) Funding will be allocated according to the priorities and values of the student body, considering past ways in which funds have best been used to enrich the community.
Article 16. Amending the Constitution
16.1 An amendment will be brought to two meetings of the Assembly of Students, first for a discussion and alteration, and again for discussion, alteration, and submission for a two thirds vote. A student-wide ballot must approve the amendment by simple majority.

--Thought up and written by

Ad Hoc Recommendations

Last Senate meeting there was an ad hoc that could reasonably called "the Committee to clean up the huge Senate mess". Its members are Jerzy Kaufman, Asia Bennett, Michael Landsman, and Nick Tagliarino, and its recommendations are the following:

In response to constitutional concerns raised during the Fall 2009, an adhoc on Constitutional Compliance was formed to investigate these concerns and to propose fair solutions.

Below are the committee’s recommendations:

Recommendation 1
Changes to Current Constitution vs. Changes to the Bylaws

Due to the fact that our current working constitution (Constitution of the Pitzer College Student Senate),, which was voted for by the majority of Student Senate in the academic year of 2008-2009, has yet to be approved by College Council, we, as an Adhoc committee, find it to be of the utmost importance that this document is endowed with the proper legitimacy through an approval from College Council. In order for this to occur, the Student Senate must first come to an agreement as to how best to make our current constitution adhere to the Faculty and Student Bylaws. We believe that once the appropriate changes have been made, particularly those regarding elections and appointments, and, subsequently, our constitution is in compliance with the Student and Faculty Bylaws and thereafter deemed legitimate, then the Student Senate will have the respected authority to implement changes to the Faculty and Student Bylaws in the future. Without a constitution approved by College Council, any changes directly made to Bylaws will leave the problem of constitutional and governmental illegitimacy still uncured. For the sake of efficiency, the priority of the Senate in the short-run must be to ensure that our current Constitution, which we have used as governing document since the start of the 2009-2010 academic year, is validated by the administration of Pitzer College. In the long-run, the Senate may decide whether or not changes should be made to the current Student and Faculty-Bylaws. However, due to the limited amount of College Council meetings remaining this year and the fact that decisions made by the Senate in 2010 will continually be considered meaningless without the support of a genuine legal document, we, as a government body, should take the appropriate initiative and work towards validating our current constitution. For the Student Senate of Pitzer College as well as the Student body, as its own sovereign entity, the decision to function under legitimate circumstances must be made in timely fashion.


--Thought up and written by

Spotted: Chris Brunelle in a Santa Hat


--Thought up and written by

What Can $50,000 Do?

The Contra Costa Times reports that "The Associated Students of Claremont McKenna College spent $50,000 to have [Lupe] Fiasco perform at [Bridges] auditorium."

Put another way, CMC put the equivalent of a full year's tuition toward bringing him.  Of course, in the event that the 2500-seat venue is filled to capacity with tickets sold at $20 each, they'll break even.


--Thought up and written by

PP Basketball Wins!

RT @arimyg How do you do it Pomona!? How!? Pomona-Pitzer Victory! 47-36! HOW?!

Reports on Twitter that Pomona- Pitzer Men's Basketball beat Claremont-Mudd-Scripps, confirmed by the yelling hooligans outside my door.


--Thought up and written by

Pit-Stop Now Open Late

Starting tonight, the Pit-Stop Cafe stays open until 10 pm!

The Virtue of Interdisciplinarity

Admission Counselor and recent Pitzer grad Adam Lev Rosenzweig '09 wrote a letter to the editor published in the Chronicle of Higher Education.  I first met Adam way back in the Fall of 2006 when we both took "Victorian America".  He would often say smart things on the intellectual level of the letter below, and in response I would smile dreamily at him.

...anyway, the point of his letter (I think) is to defend interdisciplinarity, at least in social sciences and at colleges like Pitzer.  To separate the disciplines would relegate the histories of women, sexual minorities, and ethnic minorities to second-class status.  All of those threads should be valued in college courses.

"The Virtues of Interdisciplinarity"

To the Editor:

The tone of alarmism surrounding the wholesale reorganization of academia is unnecessary. Jerry A. Jacobs's thought-provoking article ("Interdisciplinary Hype," The Chronicle Review, November 27) counts most of its supporters in the field of the sciences, and practically all at the professional research level. I would at least make the case for interdisciplinarity at the undergraduate level.

Graduate schools will train their students in the applied methods of their fields. Indeed, I agree with Professor Jacobs's assessment that the creation of "centers" and "institutes" most likely embodies the most practical solution to the interdisciplinary debate at the professional research level. There is evidence that during students' introduction to higher education, however, it is helpful to cast a broader net. Take the example of medical schools, which are famously admitting more and more students with undergraduate backgrounds in the liberal arts and humanities—fields that Professor Jacobs has shown to exhibit significantly higher rates of cross-disciplinary citation.

Regarding American studies, Professor Jacobs inappropriately assumes that the goal of American studies has been to identify a "unified theory of American culture." That idiom, echoing the storied "unified theory" in physics, reflects the science-centered perspective of the current disciplinary conversation. In American historiography, the "unified theory" equivalent is known as "consensus history," and has been intellectually out of fashion since the middle of the 20th century. It is clear that American studies gives space and voice to groups in American society that have been marginalized by traditional American historians. Relegating those scholars and their subjects to "area studies" (the return to monodisciplinary scholarship) only supports the feeling that, while their stories are valid, they are somehow not "American." Therefore, indeed, good American-studies scholars would balk at the advancement of a unified theory.

I can only hope that undergraduate liberal-arts institutions like the one I am privileged to work for continue to lead the way in valuing the intellectual diversity of our interdisciplinary faculty who, after all, are training the students who so eagerly seek positions at the feet of you established university professors.

Adam Rosenzweig
Admission Counselor
Pitzer College
Claremont, Calif.


--Thought up and written by

Save. The. Date.

Meet Jeff, a Pitzer alum, and his fiance Erin, a Scripps alumna.
Now meet their epic video wedding "Save the Date" .

It's what Michael Scott would have created for Jim and Pam--if he had gotten a media studies degree from Pitzer College.


--Thought up and written by

Lupe Fiasco Comes to Claremont

ASCMC is bringing Lupe Fiasco to Big Bridges Auditorium on Friday, March 5, 2010.  Tickets go on sale next week and will cost $20 for Pitzer students.


--Thought up and written by

New Claremont Student Publication!

Via the Port Side:


"Liberty's Last Stand: A Student Publication to the Defense of Individual Liberty" just launched over at CMC:

Liberty’s Last Stand is a student publication at Claremont McKenna College in Southern California dedicated to the maximization of individual freedom and liberty.  The publication’s staff was organized in 2009, due to resistance to libertarian views in existing student publications, and it released its first edition in January of 2010.  Liberty’s Last Stand covers issues pertaining to liberty internationally, domestically, in California, and at the Claremont Colleges.

So this gives CMC yet another notch on its student media bedpost: The CMC Forum.  The Claremont Conservative.  The Claremont Port Side.  (And probably other sources I don't even know about.)  And now, Liberty's Last Stand.

I've been pretty critical of some of the stuff various CMC outlets have published (shocking, I know) but you have to give them credit:  they value public discourse.


--Thought up and written by

December Debacles: Final Senate Meeting Part 1

This is a partial transcript from the final Senate meeting of the year on Sunday December 6, 2009.  My emphasis is supplied throughout the transcript, and my commentary is interspersed.

Senate Chair Brian Orser: [unintelligible] We need to finish before the end of the semester. To that end we need to deal with the issue of membership and the issue of our own legitimacy. There have been a lot of allegations made on the interwebs, about the senate, about this constitution being brought forward, about our current constitution, about the executive board of senate, and I’m not going to address all of those allegations in turn but there are a few primary issues. I’m not sure what’s going on behind me, does someone need to [unintelligible] ...

Those primary issues are this letter we received, they are our current constitution, and they are the bylaws of college governance. An incidental issue is the judicial council: its history and its [unintelligible]. Now we’ve been prompted by this letter from the dean of students to look into matters of compliance... I think there are enough people here who haven’t read this letter that I should probably read that letter.

Me, Your Humble Blogger: I have a question, I’m really sorry to interrupt you. Are we actually in discussion right now? Are we changing the order of the agenda?

BO: No, actually. I’m-- We don’t have normal status as a governing body right now; we need to address this before all other things. We cannot make decisions because the legitimacy of our government has been called into question. And as for the letter I’m about to read, our position in the college governance system is sort of questionable right now if you don’t mind.

I found this inaccurate and unnecessarily dramatic.  Senate has been terrible for the past semester, but to characterize it as illegitimate because Jim Marchant said so is ridiculous.

Sean Sullivan '10: If you don’t mind, can we just ask if people have read this letter, it’s a really long letter [unintelligible].

BO: I know for a fact that there are people here who haven’t.

I also found this annoying:  Orser essentially admits that he consults with certain Senators ahead of time, but not others.  Further evidence of this comes later.

Charles Butler '10: Then perhaps we might as well ask the author of this letter [Jim Marchant] to present it.

Charles points out that Dean of Students Jim Marchant was sitting in the room at the time, and I agreed with Charles: Jim Marchant would be the best person to explain the letter that he wrote and submitted.

BO: I would ask that I continue speaking without interruption for at least a few more minutes. If that’s okay. Thank you. The relevant section of the letter reads that there are certain positions which [unintelligible] people were appointed to standing committees of the college instead of being elected as required by the student senate constitution. Now those positions are indicated as one on academic planning, one on diversity, one on external studies, two on campus life, and all four of the aesthetics committee positions.

The issue here is that all of those positions are meant to be elected as per the current constitution of student senate. They were appointed by the executive board at the beginning of the semester. They should have been elected in the spring on the ballot upon which all of us were elected, but for legal reasons that ballot was incomplete.

(I don't know what "legal reasons" means in this context.)

BO: The ballot included the current constitution under which we are operating as well as the executed board. It also included several members who are on senate today. Most notably included Mr. [Hale] Shaw [’12] as sports representative, who no longer exists unfortunately as well as PAct representative position. Because the constitution, which changed the composition of senate, was on the same ballot as certain positions which were eliminated or changed, we have this issue. Hale’s disappeared.

The position of Sports Representative was added to Senate's composition two years ago, as an attempt to increase school spirit.  When we were revising the Senate Constitution last year, I don't recall anybody bringing it up.  Personally, I think Hale is a very smart and dedicated Senator and I value his input.  I think his talent is being wasted.  But when push comes to shove, his position doesn't exist, and Hale hasn't acted as a representative would be expected to.  He hasn't, to my knowledge, publicly solicited the input of Pitzer athletes, held athlete meetings, or brought sports-related issues to Student Senate.  If Brian is using this example as one of the terrible things that the existing Constitution has done, I think he should keep searching.

BO: Also, I believe Ms. [Meredith] Gabriel [’12] as a member, I believe her position has changed from elected to appointed. So she was elected to a position that became appointed.

This is exactly what should be happening all across Senate: we should elect students to every single position, even if it says in the Constitution that they should be appointed.  If there is anything positive that has come out of the larger debate about the new Constitutional proposal, it is that students want every position to be elected.

BO: Also, those elections did not include elections for judicial council as they should have.  We began the semester without judicial council appointments or elections.

And elections were never held, except for the First-Year Representative position, during the Fall semester.  I'll get into the judicial council debacle in another post.

BO: So that’s the context in which we find ourselves. The constitution under which we are currently operating also brought in in that same ballot, and that constitution is, in a certain sense, the point of this discussion.

The bylaws of faculty and student governance are the legally binding bylaws of faculty and student governance. They are made such by the bylaws of the College which indicates that they will be such. The bylaws of the Faculty and Student governance are in the faculty handbook alongside the governance section, section 4 of the faculty handbook, which is a sort of appendix on the composition of various committees, etc.

The issue here which I’ve been attempting to arrive at is that our current constitution is not actually congruous with the bylaws of faculty and student governance. In fact the constitution under which we are operating is in so many important ways, out of compliance with the bylaws of faculty and student governance that we find ourselves it seems in some sort of crisis:  What document is authoritative and what should be happening.

I will give a few illustrations: for example, Academic Planning Committee: as enumerated-- its membership as enumerated in the governance section 4 of the faculty handbook will be 4 appointed student members, yeah 4 appointed student members. In our current constitution, we read that there will be one elected position and two appointed positions.

So we have disagreement in number and what mode of selection. Now, this is a problem because there is disagreement. We cannot have a body which is constituted with disagreement, disagreeing documents. Now the reason that we have this situation, that we have this sort of disagreements is, is really unfortunate. Our current constitution was never taken to college council. Our constitution is actually not our official constitution. Two points on this. College council is the chief authority in the college governance system. But as far as we’re concerned, the college council is the highest body. The college council is the one that approves all changes to all of them--college governance.

Here is where I believe Brian is dramatically overstating the conflict.  Student autonomy is often stated as a core value of the college- the administrators and faculty don't care how we conduct ourselves as a body except when it interferes with larger processes of College governance.   The only reason Jim Marchant sent his letter to Student Senate asking it to comply with its own rulebook is when Executive Board illegally appointed several people to positions that are required to be elected.

And you know, this sounds technical, okay so, let’s just take our current constitution to college council. Unfortunately that won’t actually fix the issue, because the reason we have this issue is that if our current constitution had been taken and directly approved-- by this body and the student body-- had been taken to college council, they would have said sorry, it’s going to be a much longer process for you.  You need to make sure that your document and the bylaws of the college are in agreement. We could -- our current student senate constitution to the college council.

Now, that leaves us in a little bit of a bind, because in the faculty and student governance bylaws, it indicates that the constitution of student senate will be the student senate constitution found in the faculty handbook. There’s actually a legally resting place for our constitution. I can’t change some words and the cover page and say that it’s our constitution. Unfortunately, and I talked to professor [Stuart] McConnell about this, who spearheaded provisions of the faculty handbook, unfortunately because student senate is a very student sort of thing, they didn’t look at any of the sections pertaining to students.


--Thought up and written by

Pomona.edu is Down- What Will Come Up?

Pomona.edu is currently down. Based on chatter about their big groundbreaking site redesign process, I'm guessing the new site will be up and running on Monday. Remember, when EDUcheckup.com reviewed their site a few months ago, it scored an embarrassing 47%.   I'll be interested to see how it looks!

ETA: On the EDUcheckup review page, Pomona web dude Rory Reiff said that the launch date was going to be January 11, 2010.


--Thought up and written by

WTF, People?

Dear Pitzer,

On Saturday morning, it was discovered that the Marquis Library was treated with disrespect. Furniture and other various items were taken apart and moved. This created an environment that does not allow our students to study comfortably or at all.

At this time, The Marquis Library will be closed until further notice. Please use the study rooms in the residence halls or Honnald/Mudd.

Sorry for the invonvenience.

Sappho Su

Marquis Manager

Claremont Architect Says Smart Things About Weather

This is absolutely incredible: Someone has said something intelligent about the weather we're having! A Seattle architect (I can't figure out exactly who) from Johnston Architects ("An outlet for news and ideas from the Seattle-based Architecture firm") wrote this post, reproduced almost in its entirety below:

But the real problem with rain in Southern California is the drainage. Like I said, it rains very rarely, but when it does the volume is incredible. For some reason, the urban planners who built this area decided to largely neglect these rains, probably figuring that people could deal for a day or two. Los Angeles is a city known for it’s pavement, which is quite impermeable and facilitates massive runoff during storms. Claremont (and, I assume, the rest of SoCal) is no different. The result is that when it rains, the few storm drains drilled into the sides of the streets are completely inadequate, and the roads turn to rivers.

I wish I had photos to show but I don’t have a camera down here, so a description will have to do. There’s one street in particular, College Way, that becomes inundated during storms. It’s a central street that you pretty much have to cross to get from the dorms to the academic buildings. Because the Claremont Colleges are built on a slight grade and Pomona is at the bottom, the rain accumulates as it cascades down the impermeable, drainage-free roads and parking lots. By the time it reaches College it’s two or three inches deep in the gutters, rushing by like a channeled stream. Roads are built convex so that the runoff like this accumulates at the sides so it won’t inconvenience cars, so the difficulty lies in getting to and from the middle of the road.

The first day I had to cross these rapids, I tried to jump to the shallow center, but misjudged the depth. As soon as I landed in the half-inch, flowing water, it swept up around my feet and drenched my shoes and socks.  Feet wet, I trudged on to my class, trying to figure out a better way to get around. The next day I went out of my way to walk down to the intersection where College runs into 6th Street, in the hopes that crossing would be easier. It wasn’t, and I again essentially waded across the street.

The frustrating part of all of this is that storm water runoff is a relatively easy problem to address, at least in the design stage.  The more permeable an area is, the less runoff there is to begin with.  This can be accomplished with permeable concrete, concrete pavers, and simply the elimination of unnecessary pavement in parking lots and around sidewalks. Additionally, landscape planters and swales – small plantings that absorb runoff into the ground – can be installed on and around streets with high runoff volumes.  Portland is one of many cities that has begun to implement this kind of stormwater management strategy.  Read about how successful they’ve been here.

I don’t expect the City of Claremont to take any real action regarding stormwater runoff, because it just isn’t a priority down here.  This is the kind of thing though, that needs to be included in future developments.  It has little upfront cost, and huge environmental and social benefits down the road. I think the biggest lesson to take from this, however, is the importance of fully understanding the environment you’re building in.  It only rains in Claremont a few days per year, but it was a mistake to ignore the rain altogether.  By comprehensively analyzing the spaces we’re modifying before the design process, we can take a more complete, efficient, and desirable approach to development.